Hi Tom,
>> we can easily update ConnMan to handle DEVTYPE= and DEVTYPE=ethernet. That
>> is an easy change and will keep things working. As I explained in the other
>> reply, the main reason for DEVTYPE= is to detect that it is a
>> network device that needs a management entity before it become
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> we can easily update ConnMan to handle DEVTYPE= and DEVTYPE=ethernet. That is
> an easy change and will keep things working. As I explained in the other
> reply, the main reason for DEVTYPE= is to detect that it is a
> network device that
Hi Tom,
> I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
> "Type=ethernet" to match on network devices without a DEVTYPE.
>
> We had a discussion on IRC whether we should call it Type=wired or
> Type=ethernet. I think the former may be more intuitive, but the
> la
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 01:44:08AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:54:17PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I just pushed a change[0] which allows the ma
Hi Greg,
I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
"Type=ethernet" to match on network devices without a DEVTYPE.
We had a discussion on IRC whether we should call it Type=wired or
Type=ethernet. I think the former may be more intuitive, but the
latter
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 01:44:08AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:54:17PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
> >> "Type=ethernet" to match on network dev
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:54:17PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
>> "Type=ethernet" to match on network devices without a DEVTYPE.
>>
>> We had a discussion on IRC whether we should
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:54:17PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
> "Type=ethernet" to match on network devices without a DEVTYPE.
>
> We had a discussion on IRC whether we should call it Type=wired or
> Type=ethernet. I think the for
Hi,
I just pushed a change[0] which allows the match syntax
"Type=ethernet" to match on network devices without a DEVTYPE.
We had a discussion on IRC whether we should call it Type=wired or
Type=ethernet. I think the former may be more intuitive, but the
latter seems to be more in line with what
