This fix makes sure that the package installation will work
on systems using versions of 'GNU coreutils' older than 8.16.
Please see tools/lnr.sh for limitations for this fix.
---
configure.ac | 16 ++
tools/lnr.sh | 93 ++
2 fil
Hi,
Please review the patch and let us know if anything needs to be
changed. It would be nice if we can get this in before 213.
Umut
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Emil Sjölin wrote:
> This fix makes sure that the package installation will work
> on systems using versions of 'GNU coreutils' ol
On Wed, 07.05.14 08:54, Emil Sjölin (emil.sjo...@axis.com) wrote:
> This fix makes sure that the package installation will work
> on systems using versions of 'GNU coreutils' older than 8.16.
>
> Please see tools/lnr.sh for limitations for this fix.
> ---
> configure.ac | 16 ++
> tool
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 07.05.14 08:54, Emil Sjölin (emil.sjo...@axis.com) wrote:
>
> > This fix makes sure that the package installation will work
> > on systems using versions of 'GNU coreutils' older than 8.16.
> >
> > Please see tools/lnr.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 07.05.14 08:54, Emil Sjölin (emil.sjo...@axis.com) wrote:
>
>> This fix makes sure that the package installation will work
>> on systems using versions of 'GNU coreutils' older than 8.16.
>>
>> Please see tools/lnr.sh for limita
On 16.05.2014 06:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>> I'd really prefer if somebody who's a true shell guru could look over
>> this. Harald? (Or Zbigniew?)
> If I review it, do I get to become a true shell guru? ;)
So..
On 16.05.2014 13:00, Kay Sievers wrote:
> I do not think we should do such hacks in upstream systemd.
>
> It is a commonly available feature since quite some years, and
> building without chroot on old systems is a bit too exotic to justify
> carrying this rather large work around upstream.
>
> W
On Fri, 16.05.14 13:15, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 16.05.2014 13:00, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I do not think we should do such hacks in upstream systemd.
> >
> > It is a commonly available feature since quite some years, and
> > building without chroot on old systems is a
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 16.05.14 13:15, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16.05.2014 13:00, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > I do not think we should do such hacks in upstream systemd.
>> >
>> > It is a commonly available feature since quit
On Tue, 20.05.14 10:58, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> > Yeah, thinking about this I agree with Kay and Harald.
> >
> > If it is desirable to cross-build systemd on such an old distribution
> > I'd recommend sticking an alternative "ln" implementation into $PATH and
> > making
2014-05-20 10:58 GMT+02:00 Umut Tezduyar Lindskog :
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> If it is desirable to cross-build systemd on such an old distribution
>> I'd recommend sticking an alternative "ln" implementation into $PATH and
>> making sure it is preferred whe
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2014-05-20 10:58 GMT+02:00 Umut Tezduyar Lindskog :
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> If it is desirable to cross-build systemd on such an old distribution
>>> I'd recommend sticking an alternative "ln" imp
12 matches
Mail list logo
