Thanks a lot. Seems like angle brackets make difference. I will try it on
next patch.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:09:00AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> > How do you attach patches to the email thread? I have
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Umut Tezduyar at 02/06/13 10:09 did gyre and gimble:
>> How do you attach patches to the email thread? I have tried following
>> command and it still poped up in a different thread:
>>
>> git send-email
>> --in-reply-to=cag-
'Twas brillig, and Umut Tezduyar at 02/06/13 10:09 did gyre and gimble:
> How do you attach patches to the email thread? I have tried following
> command and it still poped up in a different thread:
>
> git send-email
> --in-reply-to=cag-2hqwummxoqgq5x35ed0mq6um5aus0y8faqry6-iec7ou...@mail.gmail.c
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Mind trying to move the stuff into one (or at least fewer) section
> instead of adding a ton of ifdefs for the same conditional?
>
> Thanks,
> Kay
Done.
-t
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-deve
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
>> Our embedded system doesn't utilize systemd-tmpfiles services. We have the
>> option of masking all systemd-tmpfiles related units but I was wondering if
>> project would be open acce
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:09:00AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> How do you attach patches to the email thread? I have tried following
> command and it still poped up in a different thread:
>
> git send-email --in-reply-to=
> cag-2hqwummxoqgq5x35ed0mq6um5aus0y8faqry6-iec7ou...@mail.gmail.com--iden
How do you attach patches to the email thread? I have tried following
command and it still poped up in a different thread:
git send-email --in-reply-to=
cag-2hqwummxoqgq5x35ed0mq6um5aus0y8faqry6-iec7ou...@mail.gmail.com--identity=systemd
patches/0001-build-sys-option-to-disable-tmpfiles.patch
On
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> Attached. Thanks.
You don't need to change systemd-update-utmp.service. It is ok to be
After= a nonexistent service.
Cheers,
Tom
PS
It is easier to review if you send the patch inline (e.g., using 'git
send-email').
__
Attached. Thanks.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> > Our embedded system doesn't utilize systemd-tmpfiles services. We have
> the
> > option of masking all systemd-tmpfiles related units but I was wondering
> if
>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> Our embedded system doesn't utilize systemd-tmpfiles services. We have the
> option of masking all systemd-tmpfiles related units but I was wondering if
> project would be open accepting a patch to disable systemd-tmpfiles during
> build time
Hi,
Our embedded system doesn't utilize systemd-tmpfiles services. We have the
option of masking all systemd-tmpfiles related units but I was wondering if
project would be open accepting a patch to disable systemd-tmpfiles during
build time.
Thanks
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
