On 27 April 2016 at 10:41, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 12:29 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:28:34 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On 04/15/2016 11:00 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>
Including the bui
On 04/27/2016 12:29 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:28:34 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 04/15/2016 11:00 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> Including the built results of systemd-initctl into your .deb packet is
>
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:28:34 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 04/15/2016 11:00 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Including the built results of systemd-initctl into your .deb packet is
>> not a solution? Making that an extra package causes
Hi Michael,
On 04/15/2016 11:00 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Including the built results of systemd-initctl into your .deb packet is
> not a solution? Making that an extra package causes too much trouble, I
> totally agree.
Did you further think about t
On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2016-04-15 19:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mack :
>> On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
> I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize i
2016-04-15 19:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mack :
> On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize it. I will need someone
to set me up with access
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize it. I will need someone
to set me up
On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize it. I will need someone
>>> to set me up with access to push the code, however.
>>
>> Great, will do
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the
>>> other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have p
On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the
>> other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have patches
>> to remove the initctl bits from the systemd repo,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the
> other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have patches
> to remove the initctl bits from the systemd repo, and add a callout from
> systemctl to binaries i
Hi Mike,
On 04/01/2016 10:11 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> The existing systemd-initctl (/dev/initctl) interface works quite
>> nicely, so I will probably end up extracting it from systemd when you
>> drop it, or just building/installing it fr
12 matches
Mail list logo
