Hi,
A French documentation was written about systemd :
http://lea-linux.org/documentations/Systemd
I still think you should cut systemadm entirely out. Unfortunately it's not
only unstable, but also there's little hope of it improving.
Zbyszek
Done. Thanks !
--
Jiel
__
On Sat, 16.05.15 22:18, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 05:43:13PM +0200, Jiel Beaumadier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A French documentation was written about systemd :
> > http://lea-linux.org/documentations/Systemd
> >
> > Its main scope is the gener
On Sat, 16.05.15 17:43, Jiel Beaumadier (beaumad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A French documentation was written about systemd :
> http://lea-linux.org/documentations/Systemd
>
> Its main scope is the general public. The documentation tends to be as
> pedagogic as possible. I think that it cou
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 05:43:13PM +0200, Jiel Beaumadier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A French documentation was written about systemd :
> http://lea-linux.org/documentations/Systemd
>
> Its main scope is the general public. The documentation tends to be as
> pedagogic as possible. I think that it could be
Hi,
A French documentation was written about systemd :
http://lea-linux.org/documentations/Systemd
Its main scope is the general public. The documentation tends to be as
pedagogic as possible. I think that it could be interesting for French
speaking users to put a link towards this doc at the off
