At Hackers News, someone (seemingly involved with OpenRC) claims that
the systemd API is somehow licensed under the LGPL. Thus making it
impossible for OpenRC to implement the same API.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6446700 for the entire comments
and
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:52:09PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
At Hackers News, someone (seemingly involved with OpenRC) claims that
the systemd API is somehow licensed under the LGPL. Thus making it
impossible for OpenRC to implement the same API.
See
On Thu, 26.09.13 15:52, Olav Vitters (o...@vitters.nl) wrote:
At Hackers News, someone (seemingly involved with OpenRC) claims that
the systemd API is somehow licensed under the LGPL. Thus making it
impossible for OpenRC to implement the same API.
See
On 2013-09-26 17:11, Lennart Poettering wrote:
And besides that: the glibc headers carry the
word for word identical copyright header (only replacing systemd by
GNU C Library). So if those headers are OK for usage with OpenRC
the
systemd headers should be too.
But, if I understand correctly,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:46:40PM +0100, Adam Spragg wrote:
On 2013-09-26 17:11, Lennart Poettering wrote:
And besides that: the glibc headers carry the
word for word identical copyright header (only replacing systemd by
GNU C Library). So if those headers are OK for usage with OpenRC
the
