Hi Auke,
> > whether anybody has pointers we should follow or even experience using
> > systemd for bare minimum images.
>
> Out of curiosity, but where does the consumed space actually sink
> into? Could you post perhaps the equivalend of something like du or
> list the top 20 largest items?
Th
Hi,
- Original Message -
> On Wed, 27.03.13 11:49, Tino Breddin (tbred...@tpip.net) wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with
> > a maximum of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at
> > ~1MB using Systemd we are
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Tino Breddin wrote:
> We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with a
> maximum of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at ~1MB
> using Systemd
> we are currently getting images sizes of ~10MB. At first glance the systemd
On Wed, 27.03.13 11:49, Tino Breddin (tbred...@tpip.net) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with
> a maximum of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at
> ~1MB using Systemd we are currently getting images sizes of ~10MB. At
> f
El 27/03/13 07:49, Tino Breddin escribió:
Hi there,
We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with a maximum
of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at ~1MB using Systemd
we are currently getting images sizes of ~10MB. At first glance the systemd
binarie
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Tino Breddin wrote:
> t step would be to dive in and remove duplicate or unneeded functionality.
I assume you have already disabled all the things you can via
./configure switches?
-t
___
systemd-devel mailing list
syst
ssage -
From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
To: "Tino Breddin"
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:09:05 PM
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Optimizing systemd binaries for small deployments
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:49:44AM +0100, Tino Breddin w
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:49:44AM +0100, Tino Breddin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with a
> maximum of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at ~1MB
> using Systemd
> we are currently getting images sizes of ~10MB. At f
Hi there,
We are in the process of creating a very small image for devices with a maximum
of 4MB flash. Compared to a SysV variant which clocks in at ~1MB using Systemd
we are currently getting images sizes of ~10MB. At first glance the systemd
binaries seem quite large. Before diving into lots
