On Fri, 06.03.15 16:17, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
enabled foo.service
2015-03-06 17:09 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
Le 06/03/2015 16:17, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
enabled foo.service which declares After=tmp.mount, or if I add the After=
statement to
Le 06/03/2015 16:17, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com:
It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
enabled foo.service which declares
Le 04/03/2015 13:40, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 13:19, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Before=systemd-timesyncd.service foo.service local-fs.target umount.target
systemd-timesyncd.service though is condition failed:
Condition: start condition failed at Wed
On Thu, 05.03.15 08:36, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Le 04/03/2015 16:27, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2015-03-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, just removing the symlink is kinda pointless. It might still be pulled
in by anything else that implicitly
On Wed, 04.03.15 16:27, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-03-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, just removing the symlink is kinda pointless. It might still be pulled
in by anything else that implicitly depepends on /tmp.
What unit is supposed
Le 04/03/2015 16:27, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2015-03-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, just removing the symlink is kinda pointless. It might still be pulled
in by anything else that implicitly depepends on /tmp.
What unit is supposed to pull in tmp.mount
Just for the record: I didn't try on trunk yet, only systemd v219 that
we ship in vivid.
Cheers,
Didier
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service declares some
relationship with a .mount unit.
For instance, having tmp.mount disable (and nothing mounting /tmp as
tmpfs in fstab):
foo.service:
[Unit]
After=tmp.mount
[Service]
ExecStart=/bin/echo foo
[Install]
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service declares some relationship
with a .mount unit.
For instance, having tmp.mount disable (and nothing mounting /tmp as tmpfs
in fstab):
foo.service:
[Unit]
Le 04/03/2015 09:29, Andrei Borzenkov a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com wrote:
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw)
status on tmp.mount:
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tmp.mount; disabled; vendor preset:
enabled)
It says enabled here, although I'm
On Wed, 04.03.15 09:21, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service declares some relationship
with a .mount unit.
For instance, having tmp.mount disable (and nothing mounting /tmp as tmpfs
in fstab):
tmp.mount is enabled statically via
Le 04/03/2015 12:49, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 09:21, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service declares some relationship
with a .mount unit.
For instance, having tmp.mount disable (and nothing mounting /tmp as tmpfs
On Wed, 04.03.15 13:19, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Le 04/03/2015 12:49, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 09:21, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service declares some relationship
with a .mount unit.
For
Le 04/03/2015 13:40, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 13:19, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Le 04/03/2015 12:49, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.03.15 09:21, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
It seems that we discovered an issue if a service
16 matches
Mail list logo
