On Mon, 12.01.15 10:37, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
> showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS
> specifically)"), when mount.nfs runs to mount NFS filesystems, it shells
>
Steve Dickson wrote on 13/01/15 16:29:
On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS
specifically)"), when mount.nfs runs to mount NFS filesystems, it shells
out to /usr/sbin/start-sta
On 01/12/2015 05:40 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Steve Dickson wrote on 12/01/15 20:31:
>> Hello
>>
>> On 01/12/2015 05:37 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
>>> showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgr
Andrei Borzenkov wrote on 12/01/15 18:31:
> В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:34:37 +
> Colin Guthrie пишет:
>
>>
>> It seems that it's not activated here any longer, despite me having
>> remote-fs.target enabled and, as remote-fs-pre.target is static, I
>> cannot specifically enable it. It's my understa
Steve Dickson wrote on 12/01/15 20:31:
> Hello
>
> On 01/12/2015 05:37 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
>> showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS
>> specifically)"), when mount.nfs runs to mo
Hello
On 01/12/2015 05:37 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
> showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS
> specifically)"), when mount.nfs runs to mount NFS filesystems, it shells
> out to /usr/sbin
В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:34:37 +
Colin Guthrie пишет:
>
> It seems that it's not activated here any longer, despite me having
> remote-fs.target enabled and, as remote-fs-pre.target is static, I
> cannot specifically enable it. It's my understanding that it should be
> automatically started.
>
Colin Guthrie wrote on 12/01/15 10:37:
> So, overall is remote-fs-pre.target sufficient here, or should we look
> into supporting this in a more hotplug/JIT friendly way?
Digging into this further, I actually notice a problem with
remote-fs-pre.target, at least on my system.
It seems that it's no
Hi,
On a related note to my previous message (subject "systemctl status not
showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS
specifically)"), when mount.nfs runs to mount NFS filesystems, it shells
out to /usr/sbin/start-statd which in turn calls sytemctl to start
rpc.statd ser
