On 22.10.2014 21:08, Tobias Hunger wrote:
Hi Lennart,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Sorry for the late response, been travelling for a month, and then
have been more travelling, and still trying to process all the mails
that queued up
On 09.09.2014 17:01, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Tobias Hunger wrote on 05/09/14 19:34:
Any place that you would care to recomend? It would suck to have each
distro put kernels somewhere else.
Good question.
On Mageia and Fedora (at least originally, not sure if it's changed
recently), the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
snip
Correct. I can see that for some uses this might appear as overkill,
but in general I would not make much of a distinction between the
kernel and the basic userspace here, they really belong together.
I
On Fri, 05.09.14 20:34, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
Sorry for the late response, been travelling for a month, and then
have been more travelling, and still trying to process all the mails
that queued up since.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
Hi Lennart,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Sorry for the late response, been travelling for a month, and then
have been more travelling, and still trying to process all the mails
that queued up since.
No problem at all:-)
On Fri, Sep 5,
On Wed, 22.10.14 21:08, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote:
My idea would be that the initrd contains that info. Each usr tree
comes with one initrd, and that initrd knows which usr tree to boot.
That implies that each installation snapshot must come with an initrd,
even if the
Simon McVittie wrote on 09/09/14 19:02:
Inside there would be a:
/usr/lib/kernel/kernel-version/modules/
folder containing the actual modules (same as
/lib/modules/kernel-version/kernel/)
This seems like moving things around for the sake of moving things
around. If Fedora, Debian and
Tobias Hunger wrote on 05/09/14 19:34:
Any place that you would care to recomend? It would suck to have each
distro put kernels somewhere else.
Good question.
On Mageia and Fedora (at least originally, not sure if it's changed
recently), the modules are in:
/lib/modules/kernel-version/
tree.
On 09/09/14 16:01, Colin Guthrie wrote:
On Mageia and Fedora (at least originally, not sure if it's changed
recently), the modules are in:
/lib/modules/kernel-version/
tree.
...
The actual modules are stored in a:
/lib/modules/kernel-version/kernel/
subfolder.
It's the same on Debian and
Hi
I have read
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
with interest and since I am using a home-grown image based
installation scheme anyway, I would like to try and move that closer
to the proposal from the systemd cabal. It is pretty easy to create
the
On Fri, 05.09.14 16:19, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi
I have read
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
with interest and since I am using a home-grown image based
installation scheme anyway, I would like to try and move that closer
Hi Lennart,
thanks for taking the time to reply!
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Yeah, we want to encourage distros to install kernels into /usr,
somewhere next to where the kmods already are, and then copy that over
where necessary into the
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote:
I see that secure boot wants one file and that you will need to merge kernel
and initrd into one. But you will need the meta data to link the kernel/initrd
combo to a combination of root-subvolume and usr-subvolume. IIRC chromeos
13 matches
Mail list logo
