Hey Dan-
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Mace wrote:
> This is on my backburner at the moment while I work on some other things.
Did you ever try things out with Go 1.3?
Thanks!
Brandon
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedes
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:28:06PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I think that designing the api in steps like this will make it harder
> > to get a consistent design. The journal api is rather small, so I don't
> > think i
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Mace wrote:
> This is on my backburner at the moment while I work on some other things.
> Hitting the segfault while testing our primary use case and being unable to
> reproduce the error made me nervous enough that I don't feel comfortable
> promoting any
- Original Message -
> From: "Brandon Philips"
> To: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> Cc: "Dan Mace" , "systemd Mailing List"
> ,
> appinfra-l...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:28:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-dev
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> I think that designing the api in steps like this will make it harder
> to get a consistent design. The journal api is rather small, so I don't
> think it is hard to cover most of it in the initial design. In my
> experience, ge
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:56:24PM -0400, Dan Mace wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We've been working on golang bindings to the systemd journal interface
> (sd-journal.h), as well as a higher level go API which builds on the
> bindings. The immediate goal is to replace the use of forked calls to
> journa
On Tue, 10.06.14 10:13, Brandon Philips (bran...@ifup.co) wrote:
> > Can you please point me to the implementation? All I've seen is this:
> >
> > https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/blob/master/journal/send.go
> >
> > Which only handles writes via the Unix socket. The implementation we're
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Brandon Philips"
> To: "Dan Mace"
> Cc: appinfra-l...@redhat.com, systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:08:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Soliciting feedback for golang bindings to the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Dan Mace wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Soliciting feedback for golang bindings to the
>> systemd journal C API
>>
>> The CoreOS crew has already done most of this work by writing a native
>> Go implementation (rather than wr
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Dan Mace wrote:
> http://fpaste.org/107299/14019224/
Hrm, odd. Was it with the given tests? I will try it out and see if I
can reproduce. I don't see anything immediately wrong in the code.
Thanks,
Brandon
___
syste
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Dan Mace wrote:
> Which only handles writes via the Unix socket. The implementation we're
> prototyping supports journal queries in ways that (to my knowledge) aren't
> possible without either forking to external tools (e.g. journalctl) or
> linking to sd-journ
- Original Message -
> From: "David Timothy Strauss"
> To: "Dan Mace"
> Cc: appinfra-l...@redhat.com, "systemd Mailing List"
>
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 8:29:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Soliciting feedback for golang bindings
The CoreOS crew has already done most of this work by writing a native
Go implementation (rather than wrapping the C APIs).
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hello!
We've been working on golang bindings to the systemd journal interface
(sd-journal.h), as well as a higher level go API which builds on the bindings.
The immediate goal is to replace the use of forked calls to journalctl in a
project. To that end, we've been wrapping only the subset o
14 matches
Mail list logo
