Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-05-10 Thread Stef Bon
> Such kind of infrastructure already exists - see os-autoinst [1]. Atm > it's used primary by openQA [2] of openSUSE project to test our Factory, > but main page claims a support for other distributions as well. > Hi, You go into the numbner oi tests available, and how to improve , maybe Shuttle

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-05-10 Thread Michal Vyskocil
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:26:56AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 24.04.12 21:47, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > > > https://plus.google.com/115547683951727699051/posts/JCDko6rkic5 > > systemd: 20 test tools, Upstart: 17 test tools. > > That said, we always can use

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-04-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.04.12 21:47, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > Mark Shuttleworth posted recently on Ubuntu sticking with Upstart [1]: > > "Rumours and allegations of a move from Upstart to SystemD are unfounded: > Upstart has a huge battery of tests, the competition has virtually none. >

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-04-25 Thread David Strauss
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 22:23, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > Not unless they posted technical stuff, in which case it's possible they > do not wish to share > their findings. > Indeed, I'm particularly interested in technical stuff discussing functionality gaps or theoretical criticism of the systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-04-24 Thread Albert Strasheim
Hello On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:47 AM, David Strauss wrote: > Mark Shuttleworth posted recently on Ubuntu sticking with Upstart [1]: > I have a few questions I'm hoping people here can help with: > * How accurate is the claim that Upstart has far more comprehensive > automated testing? If systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-04-24 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:47 PM, David Strauss wrote: > * How accurate is the claim that Upstart has far more comprehensive > automated testing? If systemd significantly lags here or could -- in any > case -- stand improvement in automated testing, are there any plans in the > works to remedy that

[systemd-devel] Ubuntu, Upstart, and systemd

2012-04-24 Thread David Strauss
Mark Shuttleworth posted recently on Ubuntu sticking with Upstart [1]: "Rumours and allegations of a move from Upstart to SystemD are unfounded: Upstart has a huge battery of tests, the competition has virtually none. Upstart knows everything it wants to be, the competition wants to be everything.