Re: [systemd-devel] contingent After

2011-11-07 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 11/05/2011 06:09 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: Thanks to the help provided by members of the list, myDaemon is now functioning correctly under systemd. Now for myUpperDaemon: IF myDaemon is enabled; then myUpperDaemon must start after myDaemon ELSE myUpperDaemon must start anyway ENDI

[systemd-devel] contingent After

2011-11-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
Thanks to the help provided by members of the list, myDaemon is now functioning correctly under systemd. Now for myUpperDaemon: IF myDaemon is enabled; then myUpperDaemon must start after myDaemon ELSE myUpperDaemon must start anyway ENDIF Actually myUpperDaemon depends on numerous daemons