El 20/05/14 12:16, Lennart Poettering escribió:
> Please, remove the old cruft! Or at least disable it by default int the
> code!
mdadm also has the same ugly assumptions.. even worst, it does not use
libudev but determines if udev is running by :
( (stat("/dev/.udev", &stb) == 0 || stat("/run/
On Mon, 19.05.14 10:13, Peter Rajnoha (prajn...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > broken. We start these things in parallel, they create these races
> > without reason. Since ages we don't support non-devtmpfs kernels
> > anymore, so it's *always* wrong to invoke mknod(), since the kernel will
> > create the
On 05/15/2014 11:38 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 15.05.14 23:15, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Runtime Directory.
>> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Lock Directory.
>
> This looks like remains from a *really* o
On 16/05/14 16:31, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 16.05.14 03:20, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> "Minimal" configurations? Are you kidding?
>
> If you want something "minimal", then just use devtmpfs, and don't
> involve userspace at all in creating device nodes. This is not a
On Fri, 16.05.14 03:20, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Runtime Directory.
> >> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Lock Directory.
> >
> > This looks like remains from a *really* old systemd version. THis does not
> > exist an
On 15/05/14 23:33, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Andy Kittner wrote:
>
> What is "Mounted Runtime Directory"? Is that /run? That must be part
> of PID1's own early initialization, nothing to run externally.
I thought so from the name, but aparently it is just some /var/ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/05/14 23:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 15.05.14 23:15, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Runtime Directory.
>> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Lock Directory.
>
On Thu, 15.05.14 23:15, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Runtime Directory.
> | May 15 22:06:47 pinky systemd[1]: Mounted Lock Directory.
This looks like remains from a *really* old systemd version. THis does not
exist anymore. What distri
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Andy Kittner wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 15/05/14 18:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Well, something appears to create your device nodes, and it shouldn't do
>> that...
>>
>> On a udev system userspace never creates any devic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/05/14 18:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well, something appears to create your device nodes, and it shouldn't do
> that...
>
> On a udev system userspace never creates any device nodes, that's done
> on its own by the kernel via devtmpfs, ude
On Thu, 15.05.14 02:30, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 14/05/14 18:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 13.05.14 20:01, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
> >> '/dev/mapper/swap' fou
On 15/05/14 10:16, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Are you running an initrd without udev, and/or tools that mess around
> with mknod in /dev?
No, the initrd uses udev and is created by copying cryptsetup etc.
including all dependent libraries from the host system.
I recreated it yesterday, so there are the
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Andy Kittner wrote:
> On 14/05/14 18:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Tue, 13.05.14 20:01, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
>>> '/dev/mapper/swap' found, link to '/dev/dm-1'
On 14/05/14 18:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 13.05.14 20:01, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
>> '/dev/mapper/swap' found, link to '/dev/dm-1' will not be created
>> Thats the first one I find a bit fis
On Tue, 13.05.14 20:01, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
> '/dev/mapper/swap' found, link to '/dev/dm-1' will not be created
> Thats the first one I find a bit fishy, but it doesn't sound fatal
> either...
This rea
On 13/05/14 23:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Andy Kittner wrote:
>> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
>> '/dev/mapper/swap' found, link to '/dev/dm-1' will not be created
>> Thats the first one I find a bit fish
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Andy Kittner wrote:
> | May 13 18:50:33 pinky systemd-udevd[2751]: conflicting device node
> '/dev/mapper/swap' found, link to '/dev/dm-1' will not be created
> Thats the first one I find a bit fishy, but it doesn't sound fatal
> either...
When this happens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
first I hope I'm asking at the right place here, if not feel free to
kick me in the right direction.
Now, for my problem:
I have several encrypted partions set up via /etc/crypttab
Since the update to systemd-212 (from 207 I think) the fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
