On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:12:10PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
> >
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20 4:00 +]:
> >> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
> >> [2]
> >> https://github.com/sy
Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20 4:00 +]:
> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
> [2]
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-label%3Aresolve%20-label%3Ahas-pr
None of those are a regressio
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20 4:00 +]:
>> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-lab
On Thu, 20.10.16 04:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping systemd 232 would be released before systemd.conf as a
> nice simple release. Unfortunately before the conference started, there
> were too many regressions and bugs open. Since then people have
Hi,
I was hoping systemd 232 would be released before systemd.conf as a
nice simple release. Unfortunately before the conference started, there
were too many regressions and bugs open. Since then people have been piling
new stuff on top, which is good, but keeps delaying the release.
My proposal
