Am 05.03.2013 10:07, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 09:56, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>>> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch
it
like mentioned above.
>>
Am 05.03.2013 09:56, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>>> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch
>>> it
>>> like mentioned above.
>>
>> switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
>> switch_root
Am 05.03.2013 09:17, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch it
>> like mentioned above.
>
> switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
> switch_root:/# systemctl status sysroot-usr.mount
> sysroot-usr.mo
Am 05.03.2013 08:33, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> For me the sysroot-usr.mount is not mounted in my testsuite unless I patch it
> like mentioned above.
switch_root:/# ls /sysroot/usr/
switch_root:/# systemctl status sysroot-usr.mount
sysroot-usr.mount - /sysroot/usr
Loaded: loaded (/sysroot/e
Am 05.03.2013 08:08, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
>>> When we switch root we use JOB_REPLACE to default.target. This means
>>> that units which are pulled in by default.target, but already active
>>> in
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
>> When we switch root we use JOB_REPLACE to default.target. This means
>> that units which are pulled in by default.target, but already active
>> in the initrd (such as local-fs.target) will not be p
Am 05.03.2013 06:26, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> Hi Harald,
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> please review
>
> Could you comment on why this is necessary? It would be nice if we
> could reuse as much as possible from the real root rather than making
> initrd-spcific files,
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> please review
Could you comment on why this is necessary? It would be nice if we
could reuse as much as possible from the real root rather than making
initrd-spcific files, but perhaps it is not possible in this case?
I am aware o
On Mon, 04.03.13 20:09, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=8330847e949fc0c26b16910e5240eef1fe2c330a
I would have preferred if this patch had been posted on the ML first
before it was commited.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Re
Hi Tom,
please review
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=39b83cdab37623a546344622db9bbbc784c15df5
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=7d89ce303fb59743a4392eeb3110c00f100172ca
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=8330847e949fc0c26b16910e52
10 matches
Mail list logo