Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
Currently I can PXEboot, successfully switch root from initrd to
overlayfs based root, systemd starts and executes many of it's units.
Unfortunately user units are fa
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
> Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
>
> Currently I can PXEboot, successfully switch root from initrd to
> overlayfs based root, systemd starts
On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
Currently I can PXEboot, successfully switch root from
Am 16.10.2013 19:22, schrieb Warpme:
> On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
>>> Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
>>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
> >>Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based
On 10/16/13 7:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> Zbyszku,
> I add remount just after pivot_root. No change.
> I don't get one thing: why exactly such script works OK for SysV ?
> If it works for SysV - it means script leaves / in rw mode.
> So it leaves / in rw mode also for systemd (only
On 10/16/13 9:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Zbyszku,
I add remount just after pivot_root. No change.
I don't get one thing: why exactly such script works OK for SysV ?
If it works for SysV - it means script leaves / in rw mode.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I have no idea how you end
up with a read-only filesystem.
As a work-around, you can add
/etc/systemd/system/systemd-remount-fs.servic
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> none / auto remount,rw 0 0
>
> why "none" and "remount"?
"none" because at the time fstab is read, / is already mounted;
therefore the device already known. Specifying the root device in
fstab is in most cases really pointless and makes st
В Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:07:55 +0200
Kay Sievers пишет:
>
> > typically the line looks like this
> > UUID=b834776d-69d1-49c6-97c1-d6d758a438f0 / ext4 defaults
> >
> > i doubt that anything smells what "none" means
>
> It typically makes not much sense to specify the id of the rootfs in a
> file s
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:07:55 +0200
> Kay Sievers пишет:
>
>> > typically the line looks like this
>> > UUID=b834776d-69d1-49c6-97c1-d6d758a438f0 / ext4 defaults
>> >
>> > i doubt that anything smells what "none" means
>>
>> It typically m
On 10/16/13 9:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I have no idea how you end
up with a read-only filesystem.
As a work-around,
Am 17.10.2013 14:59, schrieb Warpme:
> On 10/16/13 9:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
>>> Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
>> All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I have no idea how you end
>>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> On 10/16/13 9:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
> >>Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
> >All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I have no ide
'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 13:59 did gyre and gimble:
> On 10/16/13 9:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
>>> Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
>> All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I ha
On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
it so far on this thread:
systemctl status systemd-remount-fs.service
Col
Col,
Console reports "Starting Remount Root and Ke
'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 18:15 did gyre and gimble:
> On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
>> systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
>> it so far on this thread:
>>
>> systemctl status systemd
On 10/17/13 7:59 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 18:15 did gyre and gimble:
On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
it so far on this thr
Am 17.10.2013 21:25, schrieb Warpme:
> So summarizing:
> 1.systemd-remount-fs.service status from boot sequence is OK - but / is ro
> 2.starting /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-remount-fs switches / to rw
> 3.systemctl restart systemd-remount-fs.service switches / to rw
>
> Console output from 1 & 3 is
'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 20:25 did gyre and gimble:
> On 10/17/13 7:59 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 18:15 did gyre and gimble:
>>> On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
systemd-remo
On Thursday 2013-10-17 22:16, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
> systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
> it so far on this thread:
[lots of prose]
>
>That said, as the tool worked properly, it would seem that
22 matches
Mail list logo
