On Wed, 17.12.14 20:48, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> >
> >> For the record:
> >>
> >> It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> For the record:
>>
>> It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for
>> name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS
>> do
On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> For the record:
>
> It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for
> name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS
> doesn't have support for it at the moment.
For what precisely? The m
For the record:
It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for
name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS
doesn't have support for it at the moment.
Umut
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedeskto