Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.12.14 20:48, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > > > >> For the record: > >> > >> It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get

Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > >> For the record: >> >> It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for >> name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS >> do

Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > For the record: > > It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for > name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS > doesn't have support for it at the moment. For what precisely? The m

[systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
For the record: It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS doesn't have support for it at the moment. Umut ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedeskto