On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 16:19, Stef Bon wrote:
> 2011/8/3 Kay Sievers :
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 16:07, Stef Bon wrote:
>
>>> Isn't it a good idea to provide every different namespace a own mtab,
>>> containing only the mounts visible for that namespace?
>>
>> You mean /etc/mtab? Systemd requires
2011/8/3 Kay Sievers :
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 16:07, Stef Bon wrote:
>> Isn't it a good idea to provide every different namespace a own mtab,
>> containing only the mounts visible for that namespace?
>
> You mean /etc/mtab? Systemd requires that to be symlink to
> /proc/mounts, which is always
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 16:07, Stef Bon wrote:
> I've been looking into how namespaces work, shared mounted subtrees
> and user namespaces using PAM.
>
> My own construction is using a FUSE filesystem, some bind mounts of
> system directories and (still) pam_chroot.
> and looking to switch to use p
Hi all,
I've been looking into how namespaces work, shared mounted subtrees
and user namespaces using PAM.
My own construction is using a FUSE filesystem, some bind mounts of
system directories and (still) pam_chroot.
and looking to switch to use pam_namespace.
Anyhowe, I see that with using dif
