On Sat, 15.09.12 21:57, Pierre Schmitz (pie...@archlinux.de) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
> oversight or intentional?
The original intention here was to mount only the stuff that is
necessary to get a system booted up safely in place. i.e.
On Sun, 16.09.12 17:08, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:57:00PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> >>
> >> systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
> >> oversight or i
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:08:42PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:57:00PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> >>
> >> systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
> >> oversight or
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:57:00PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
>> oversight or intentional?
> nspawn has recently grown abilities to add /dev/fd, /dev/s
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:57:00PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
> oversight or intentional?
nspawn has recently grown abilities to add /dev/fd, /dev/stdin,
/dev/stdout, /dev/stderr. I think that /dev/shm should be added
Hi,
systemd-nspawn does not create a tmpfs mount to /dev/shm. Is this an
oversight or intentional?
Greetings,
Pierre
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedes
