On Mon, 22.10.12 23:47, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> So, should the org.freedesktop.UPower.CanSuspend/Hibernate properties be
> cooked up instead to logind rather than shelling out to
> pm-is-supported?
Yes, I guess. And the clients should probably move over to logind anyway.
>
Hi,
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 22/10/12 15:28 did gyre and gimble:
>> Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on
>> how to plan for a post-pm-utils world?
>
> Not really, the interesting bits of pm-utils are done by systemd in C
> code directly. pm-utils
On Mon, 22.10.12 15:20, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
Heya,
> Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on
> how to plan for a post-pm-utils world?
Not really, the interesting bits of pm-utils are done by systemd in C
code directly. pm-utils doesn'
Hi,
Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on
how to plan for a post-pm-utils world?
pm-utils had several quirks (many of which are likely obsolete - for me
the vt switching stuff which is apparently quirked on my h/w makes
suspend/resume uglier and gives no benefit)
