On Thu, 10.03.11 13:58, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 02.03.11 00:07, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Have you actually read what I wrote?
> >>
> >> "Now, I do not care much about
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 02.03.11 00:07, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Have you actually read what I wrote?
>>
>> "Now, I do not care much about rc-sysinit itself. But I do care that
>> services that we want to be started late are *r
On Wed, 02.03.11 00:07, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Have you actually read what I wrote?
>
> "Now, I do not care much about rc-sysinit itself. But I do care that
> services that we want to be started late are *really* started late."
>
> Currently I have impression that rc-loc
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:47:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> I think the rc-local is a broken concept: the semantics of having a
>> service running after everything else are just broken, and usually just
>> something people want to
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:47:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I think the rc-local is a broken concept: the semantics of having a
> service running after everything else are just broken, and usually just
> something people want to do to avoid thinking about ordering.
Yes!
Sysadmins who w
On Tue, 01.03.11 10:34, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Historically rc.local was supposed to be run very late (last) in
> startup sequence; and systemd implicitly relies on it (at least, on
> fedora-like systems) implicitly ordering many things "to be done late"
> afetr rc-sysinit
Historically rc.local was supposed to be run very late (last) in
startup sequence; and systemd implicitly relies on it (at least, on
fedora-like systems) implicitly ordering many things "to be done late"
afetr rc-sysinit.service.
Looking at startup debug log, this assumption is wrong. There are
ma