On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +, David Härdeman wrote:
>> April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not clear that the GNOME side was implemented correctly yet.
>>> Would be nice to see the sample code.
>>>
>>> Dan
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:21:19PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>No, it does not. sd-bus was inconsistent. See, there are 3 things
>>involved in the Object-Manager:
>>
>>Signal: InterfacesAdded
>>Signal: InterfacesRemoved
>>Call: Get
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>>> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces
>>> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() call di
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +, David Härdeman wrote:
> April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, i
Hey
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces
>> >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() call didn't report them
>> >> so far
On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces
> >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() call didn't report them
> >> so far.
> >
> > Quite the contrary? If you look at the output from dbus-monito
April 25, 2017 9:54 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wro
Hi
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote
April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces
> reported by
> sd-bus should match what gd
April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager usi
April 24, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by
>> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus
>> can be considered the "r
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > > > > Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces
> > > > > reported by
> > > > > sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course,
> > > >
On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by
> >>> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus
> >>> can be considered the "reference" implementation).
> >>
> >>Does the appe
Hi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
>>> sd-bus API and there seems
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
>> sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between how gdbus and
>> sd-bus implements t
Hey
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
> sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between how gdbus and
> sd-bus implements the API.
>
> I implemented a simple ObjectManager at /org/gnome/Te
Hi,
I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the
sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between how gdbus and
sd-bus implements the API.
I implemented a simple ObjectManager at /org/gnome/TestManager which
exports objects /org/gnome/TestManager/fooX with interface
17 matches
Mail list logo
