On Tue, 26.08.14 21:58, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> В Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:38:52 +0200
> Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> > On Tue, 26.08.14 16:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
В Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:38:52 +0200
Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Tue, 26.08.14 16:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26.08.14 16:29, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > >
> > >>
On Tue, 26.08.14 16:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26.08.14 16:29, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> >> I have to say tho', I'm surprised this is something implemented in PID1.
>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 26.08.14 16:29, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> I have to say tho', I'm surprised this is something implemented in PID1.
>> >> I hadn't looked at the code, but I thought (well assumed) "systemctl
>> >> prese
On Tue, 26.08.14 16:29, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> I have to say tho', I'm surprised this is something implemented in PID1.
> >> I hadn't looked at the code, but I thought (well assumed) "systemctl
> >> preset" was actually implemented on the client side. I guess it's true
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 26.08.14 08:59, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
>> I have to say tho', I'm surprised this is something implemented in PID1.
>> I hadn't looked at the code, but I thought (well assumed) "systemctl
>> preset" was actu
On Tue, 26.08.14 08:59, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> >> If not, it's probably quicker and easier for me to do the work and
> >> maintain it in scripts rather than systemctl itself, hence why I figured
> >> I'd ask first.
> >
> > Currently the compat support for chkconfig is nicel
Lennart Poettering wrote on 26/08/14 02:19:
> On Fri, 22.08.14 15:51, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently changed my %post scripts in Mageia to use systemctl preset
>> rather than systemctl enable to allow for policy-based overrides of
>> "enable on install" behav
On Fri, 22.08.14 15:51, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently changed my %post scripts in Mageia to use systemctl preset
> rather than systemctl enable to allow for policy-based overrides of
> "enable on install" behaviour.
>
> Sadly, unlike enable, preset does not she
Hi,
I recently changed my %post scripts in Mageia to use systemctl preset
rather than systemctl enable to allow for policy-based overrides of
"enable on install" behaviour.
Sadly, unlike enable, preset does not shell out to chkconfig, so passing
a service name that's not got a native unit no long
10 matches
Mail list logo
