Hi,
systemd fails to build with using a statically libkmod.a:
libtool: link:
/home/stephan/projects/openelec-master/build.OpenELEC-ARCTIC_MC.x86_64-devel/toolchain/bin/x86_64-openelec-linux-gnu-gcc
-std=gnu99 -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Wno-inline -Wundef -Wformat=2
-Wformat-security -Wformat-nonlit
El 02/06/13 11:06, Stephan Raue escribió:
Hi,
systemd fails to build with using a statically libkmod.a:
Sure it does, there is memdup, path_is_absolute and
path_make_absolute_cmd symbols defined in systemd and kmod.
As static libraries do not have symbol visibility, you will get
collisions
Am 02.06.2013 18:56, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
El 02/06/13 11:06, Stephan Raue escribió:
Hi,
systemd fails to build with using a statically libkmod.a:
Sure it does, there is memdup, path_is_absolute and
path_make_absolute_cmd symbols defined in systemd and kmod.
As static libraries do no
El 02/06/13 13:28, Stephan Raue escribió:
Am 02.06.2013 18:56, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
El 02/06/13 11:06, Stephan Raue escribió:
Hi,
systemd fails to build with using a statically libkmod.a:
Sure it does, there is memdup, path_is_absolute and
path_make_absolute_cmd symbols defined in sys
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
> Am 02.06.2013 18:56, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
> >El 02/06/13 11:06, Stephan Raue escribió:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>systemd fails to build with using a statically libkmod.a:
> >
> >Sure it does, there is memdup, path_is_absolute and
> >path
Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
i dont agree, i some cases it makes sense. since udev is included in
systemd and udev has now its own buildins for the modprobe stuff it
should be possible to use kmod statically linked, esp. if
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Stephan Raue wrote:
> Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
>>
>>> i dont agree, i some cases it makes sense. since udev is included in
>>> systemd and udev has now its own buildins for the modprobe
On Mon, 03.06.13 00:52, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote:
>
> Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
> >On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
> >
> >>i dont agree, i some cases it makes sense. since udev is included in
> >>systemd and udev has now its own build
2013/6/4 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 03.06.13 00:52, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
>> >On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
>> >
>> >>i dont agree, i some cases it makes sense. since udev is included in
>> >>
El 04/06/13 04:39, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Mon, 03.06.13 00:52, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote:
Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stephan Raue wrote:
i dont agree, i some cases it makes sense. since udev is included in
sys
On Tue, 04.06.13 14:44, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> El 04/06/13 04:39, Lennart Poettering escribió:
> >On Mon, 03.06.13 00:52, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH:
> >>>On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200,
11 matches
Mail list logo
