On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:00:55PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> >> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer say that
On 15 May 2016 at 08:11, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2016 06:32, "Andrei Borzenkov" wrote:
> >
> > 15.05.2016 06:36, Chris Murphy пишет:
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, James Hogarth <
> james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
On 15 May 2016 06:32, "Andrei Borzenkov" wrote:
>
> 15.05.2016 06:36, Chris Murphy пишет:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2 May 2016 18:58, "James Hogarth" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On
15.05.2016 06:36, Chris Murphy пишет:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2 May 2016 18:58, "James Hogarth" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 Apr 2016 21:31, "poma" wrote:
On
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 2 May 2016 18:58, "James Hogarth" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24 Apr 2016 21:31, "poma" wrote:
>> >
>> > On 20.04.2016 22:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Apr
On 2 May 2016 18:58, "James Hogarth" wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Apr 2016 21:31, "poma" wrote:
> >
> > On 20.04.2016 22:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger <
tobias.hun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
On 24.04.2016 22:31, poma wrote:
> On 20.04.2016 22:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger
>> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Anyway, the most complete solution for BIOS, UEFI, and UEFI Secure
>> Boot systems, is fast startups as possible
On 24 Apr 2016 21:31, "poma" wrote:
>
> On 20.04.2016 22:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger
wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Anyway, the most complete solution for BIOS, UEFI, and UEFI Secure
> > Boot systems, is
On 20.04.2016 22:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger
> wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, the most complete solution for BIOS, UEFI, and UEFI Secure
> Boot systems, is fast startups as possible (which helps all kinds of
> use cases not just
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Yeah, I think dm-crypt/luks does not change metadata on disk while opening
> it, so no problems here.
What metadata change happens with linear logical volumes? I'd expect
LVM or dm metadata changes if thin
On Thu, 21.04.16 12:00, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> >> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer say that the
>> hibernation image size isn't fixed, and might be less than RAM
On Thu, 21.04.16 16:06, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart
>
> 2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> >>
On 19.04.2016 12:31, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
> Here are my thought as the main dracut maintainer:
>
> To resume from a swap disk means, that you must not change any data on disk
> while doing so, because that change would go unnoticed by the kernel, which we
> want to resume. So basically
2016-04-21 16:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> Hi Lennart
>
> 2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>>> On second
Hi Lennart
2016-04-21 12:11 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
>> On second thought, maybe not such a good idea as this would break
>> hibernate
On 20.04.2016 06:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
>>
>> So what precisely are you proposing? That we actively search for the
>> swap partition in the hibernate-resume generator?
>
> I think the main thing James is
On Thu, 21.04.16 02:50, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> > 2016-04-20 11:14 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> >>
> >> Here's the heuristics code logind uses to check whether hibernation
> >> shall be
Am 20.04.2016 22:42 schrieb "Chris Murphy" :
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger
wrote:
>
> >
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-T400-T500-and-newer-T/T460s-Does-it-have-Intel-rapid-start/m-p/3284398#M107869
>
> Too bad. I'm not
2016-04-21 0:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> 2016-04-20 11:14 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>>
>> Here's the heuristics code logind uses to check whether hibernation
>> shall be considered available or not:
>>
>>
2016-04-20 11:14 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
>
> Here's the heuristics code logind uses to check whether hibernation
> shall be considered available or not:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/shared/sleep-config.c#L229
>
> i.e. it checks that the RAM
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-T400-T500-and-newer-T/T460s-Does-it-have-Intel-rapid-start/m-p/3284398#M107869
Too bad. I'm not sure what it means though, deprecated marketing or
the actual feature is gone?
Hi Chris,
Am 20.04.2016 18:48 schrieb "Chris Murphy" :
> There two IRSTs. One is Rapid Storage (firmware raid working in
> conjunction with mdadm), the other is Rapid Start.
I am aware of that and we both refer to the same thing.
> Rapid Start is what
> I'm referring to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I am still open to add searching for the resume swap partition to the
> generator, but only where this may be done reliably, i.e. GPT, but not
> MBR. And we should either define a new GPT partition type UUID for
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
>
> Am 20.04.2016 06:47 schrieb "Chris Murphy" :
>> I kinda have to agree, if it can't be encrypted, then I think linux
>> hibernation is almost pointless, and maybe just give up. Intel Rapid
On 20 April 2016 at 10:20, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 20.04.16 08:00, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Regardless of how the hibernate generator might potentially be changed to
> > attempt to locate a valid swap partition with hibernate data,
On Wed, 20.04.16 08:00, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Regardless of how the hibernate generator might potentially be changed to
> attempt to locate a valid swap partition with hibernate data, or how
> difficult that may be given the nature of running in an initrd and as a
>
On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer say that the
> hibernation image size isn't fixed, and might be less than RAM size
> but could be a little more than RAM size, especially if some swap is
> being used.
On 20 Apr 2016 05:47, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> >
> > So what precisely are you proposing? That we actively search for the
> > swap partition in the hibernate-resume generator?
>
> I
Am 20.04.2016 06:47 schrieb "Chris Murphy" :
> I kinda have to agree, if it can't be encrypted, then I think linux
> hibernation is almost pointless, and maybe just give up. Intel Rapid
> Start (firmware managed) hibernation with SSDs and the proper GPT
> partition type
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> So what precisely are you proposing? That we actively search for the
> swap partition in the hibernate-resume generator?
I think the main thing James is after, I know I'm in this camp, is
understanding all
Am 19.04.2016 um 12:10 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Mon, 18.04.16 23:19, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There's been some discussion today about the impact of
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206936 and where the problem
>> actually lies.
>>
On Tue, 19.04.16 08:45, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It could also be fixed by anaconda adding resume= to the grub configuration
> like it already has to for the root device. The anaconda developers have
> already pushed against this and it would only fix fresh installs
On Tue, 19.04.16 07:45, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
> The generator and the actual resume is already in systemd and the anaconda
> folks on the bug did not think it should be with them and that adding
> resume= would not be the correct fix (of course that additionally has the
>
On Mon, 18.04.16 23:19, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's been some discussion today about the impact of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206936 and where the problem
> actually lies.
>
> The issue lies specifically with hibernate and affects all
On 19 Apr 2016 08:05, "Andrei Borzenkov" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> >
> > Seeing as systemd decides the swap to hibernate to in the first place,
can't
>
> No, it does not. Device to hibernate to is set by
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> Seeing as systemd decides the swap to hibernate to in the first place, can't
No, it does not. Device to hibernate to is set by previous attempt to
resume from. This device must come from somewhere. Last device
On 19 Apr 2016 04:53, "Andrei Borzenkov" wrote:
>
> 19.04.2016 01:19, James Hogarth пишет:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There's been some discussion today about the impact of
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206936 and where the
problem
> > actually lies.
> >
> > The
19.04.2016 01:19, James Hogarth пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> There's been some discussion today about the impact of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206936 and where the problem
> actually lies.
>
> The issue lies specifically with hibernate and affects all Fedora systems
> regardless of
Hi all,
There's been some discussion today about the impact of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206936 and where the problem
actually lies.
The issue lies specifically with hibernate and affects all Fedora systems
regardless of hardware (it's reproducible in a VM).
The hibernate
40 matches
Mail list logo