Will do!
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 11.01.15 18:18, Charles Devereaux (syst...@guylhem.net) wrote:
>
> > What about another option in networkd-wait-online-link.c to pass an
> > "ignore" parameter, along with a list of interfaces names, so that
> > link_r
On Sun, 11.01.15 18:18, Charles Devereaux (syst...@guylhem.net) wrote:
> What about another option in networkd-wait-online-link.c to pass an
> "ignore" parameter, along with a list of interfaces names, so that
> link_relevant does: something like:
>
> if (l->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
>
(oops, accidentally replied off-list. Reposting)
Hello
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> So if I understand it correctly you want
>
> - configure one interface
> - start some program that establishes what you call "uplink". I presume
> it results in one more interface
В Sat, 3 Jan 2015 01:24:48 -0500
Charles Devereaux пишет:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to configure systemd networking for a bridge, using v217-stable
> from anongit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable
>
> I mostly have 3 problems:
>
> 1- 3 - I do not understand how to properly use systemd-networ
Hello
I'm trying to configure systemd networking for a bridge, using v217-stable
from anongit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable
I mostly have 3 problems:
1- 3 - I do not understand how to properly use systemd-networkd-wait-online
I have one service (establishing the uplink) with:
After=net
