On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
> and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
>
> I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
>
> I have 2 mounts (one is bind mount)
On Tue, 19.05.15 12:43, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-05-19 12:28 +0200]:
> > > Note that it's a permanent state in containers where you don't
> > > actually have udev.
> >
> > NO!
> >
> > Martin, as mentioned earlier: current systemd will not bother wit
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-19 12:28 +0200]:
> > Note that it's a permanent state in containers where you don't
> > actually have udev.
>
> NO!
>
> Martin, as mentioned earlier: current systemd will not bother with
> device units at all in containers, and they hence will not be in
> "tentative"
On Tue, 19.05.15 10:30, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello Umut,
>
> Umut Tezduyar Lindskog [2015-05-19 8:23 +0200]:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > The "tentative" state is nothing the system should continously leave
> > > devices in.
On Tue, 19.05.15 08:23, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> - Isn't there a race in that "short time window" that if one tries to
> unmount stuff, things might go south!
Hmm? can you elaborate?
The differene between "tentative" and "plugged" is mostly about
unmount-on-unplug real
Hello Umut,
Umut Tezduyar Lindskog [2015-05-19 8:23 +0200]:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > The "tentative" state is nothing the system should continously leave
> > devices in. It's a state only used for very short time windows, before
> > udev is up, or when
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 18.05.15 15:59, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
>> and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
>>
>> I a
On Mon, 18.05.15 15:59, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
> and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
>
> I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
>
> I have 2 mounts (one
Hey Umut,
Umut Tezduyar Lindskog [2015-05-18 15:59 +0200]:
> I have 2 mounts (one is bind mount) on mapper device.
>
> /proc/self/mountinfo:
> 47 37 254:0 / /var/spool/storage/SD_DISK
> rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime,nodiratime shared:18 - ext4
> /dev/mapper/mmcblk0p1 rw,journal_checksum,commit=1
Hi,
There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
I have 2 mounts (one is bind mount) on mapper device.
/proc/self/mountinfo:
47 37 254:0 / /var/spool/storage/SD
10 matches
Mail list logo
