On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:28:26PM +1200, Roger Qiu wrote:
Doesn't relatime still update the time if the file is 1 day old
(regardless of modication time), and the current tmpfiles wipes
files that are older by 10 days?
Yes, everything should work with relatime, unless you set tmpfiles cleanup
On Wed, 29.04.15 22:08, Roger Qiu (roger@polycademy.com) wrote:
Hi Lennart,
So there really isn't a fast of way just checking if a file has an open file
descriptor on it?
Sometimes atime is on relatime, so it only gets updated if modification is
earlier.
Using relatime is fine,
On Wed, 29.04.15 15:10, Roger Qiu (roger@polycademy.com) wrote:
Hello all,
I'm planning to use tmpwatch's `fuser` feature.
But I'd prefer to run this simple service using systemd's tmpfiles.
Does systemd tmpfiles support running `fuser` so that way it won't delete
any files that have
Roger Qiu roger@polycademy.com schrieb:
I'm planning to use tmpwatch's `fuser` feature.
But I'd prefer to run this simple service using systemd's tmpfiles.
Does systemd tmpfiles support running `fuser` so that way it won't
delete any files that have an open file descriptor?
I
Hi Lennart,
So there really isn't a fast of way just checking if a file has an open
file descriptor on it?
Sometimes atime is on relatime, so it only gets updated if modification
is earlier.
On servers that don't shutdown, processes may access the file for long
periods of time, and the
