On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 12.12.13 15:22, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/13 14:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > kay and Daniel are working on changing the semantics of monitoring
>> > entirely. Instead of turning mo
On Thu, 12.12.13 15:22, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
> On 12/12/13 14:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > kay and Daniel are working on changing the semantics of monitoring
> > entirely. Instead of turning monitoring on and off on an existing
> > connection they want this t
On 12/12/2013 04:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 12/12/13 14:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
kay and Daniel are working on changing the semantics of monitoring
entirely. Instead of turning monitoring on and off on an existing
connection they want this to be an entirely new connection type
Colin
On 12/12/13 14:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> kay and Daniel are working on changing the semantics of monitoring
> entirely. Instead of turning monitoring on and off on an existing
> connection they want this to be an entirely new connection type
Colin Walters wanted to do this in dbus-daemon too
On Thu, 12.12.13 13:09, Lukasz Skalski (l.skal...@partner.samsung.com) wrote:
> Due to this patch, 'busctl monitor' prints all method calls,
> method errors and signals both for dbus and kdbus.
kay and Daniel are working on changing the semantics of monitoring
entirely. Instead of turning monitor
