17.01.2019 21:03, Christopher Cox пишет:
> On 1/17/19 11:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Do, 17.01.19 11:17, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
>>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=multi-user.target
>
> In my case, my script rolls through the currently running
> processes,
On 1/17/19 2:42 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 17.01.19 14:35, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
On 1/17/19 2:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 17.01.19 12:38, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
it defaults to YES and the whole discussions as that changed whe
On Do, 17.01.19 14:35, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> On 1/17/19 2:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Do, 17.01.19 12:38, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> >
> > > > > it defaults to YES and the whole discussions as that changed where
> > > > > about
> > > > > no
On 1/17/19 2:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 17.01.19 12:38, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
it defaults to YES and the whole discussions as that changed where about
nohup'd processes long ago
Changing it to "no"... I'll let you know if this fixes things or not.
Actual
On Do, 17.01.19 12:38, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> > > it defaults to YES and the whole discussions as that changed where about
> > > nohup'd processes long ago
> >
> > Changing it to "no"... I'll let you know if this fixes things or not.
> >
>
> Actually, as it turns out the no
On 1/17/19 12:09 PM, Christopher Cox wrote:
On 1/17/19 11:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.19 um 18:51 schrieb Christopher Cox:
On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, what kind of proces
On 1/17/19 11:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.19 um 18:51 schrieb Christopher Cox:
On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, what kind of processes are you missing? user session stuff? How
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:54 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 17.01.19 um 18:51 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> > On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> >>> On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, what kind of processes
On 1/17/19 11:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 17.01.19 11:17, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
In my case, my script rolls through the currently running processes, looking
for certain ones, determines listening port (ss) and gets the tim
On Do, 17.01.19 11:17, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> > > [Install]
> > > WantedBy=multi-user.target
> > >
> > > In my case, my script rolls through the currently running processes,
> > > looking
> > > for certain ones, determines listening port (ss) and gets the time the
> > > pr
Am 17.01.19 um 18:51 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
>>> On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, what kind of processes are you missing? user session stuff? How
do you shut down? Note th
On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, what kind of processes are you missing? user session stuff? How
do you shut down? Note that display managers are likely to terminate
the user sessions fir
Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Hmm, what kind of processes are you missing? user session stuff? How
>> do you shut down? Note that display managers are likely to terminate
>> the user sessions first, and only initiate system shutd
On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 17.01.19 10:18, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
On 1/17/19 5:50 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
With that you can now put together a unit that is terminated
relatively early on during shutdown: just make it
"After=multi-user.targ
On Do, 17.01.19 10:18, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> On 1/17/19 5:50 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > With that you can now put together a unit that is terminated
> > relatively early on during shutdown: just make it
> > "After=multi-user.target graphical.target default.target",
On 1/17/19 5:50 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
With that you can now put together a unit that is terminated
relatively early on during shutdown: just make it
"After=multi-user.target graphical.target default.target", so that it
gets activated at boot very late, and thus deactivated at shutdown
ver
Am 17.01.19 um 17:00 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> On 1/16/19 11:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> that all is not really new and was not better with sysvinit, it only was
>> slow enough, full of sleep/usleep hacks and so most of the time by luck
>> worked but with no guarantess anyways
>
> What I sai
On 1/16/19 11:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that all is not really new and was not better with sysvinit, it only was
slow enough, full of sleep/usleep hacks and so most of the time by luck
worked but with no guarantess anyways
What I said it that synchronous execution of a script was possible pri
On Mi, 16.01.19 22:44, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> On 01/16/2019 12:51 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> > If you want to run it early in the shutdown process, then keep
> > DefaultDependencies=yes, in which case it will run before the base
> > dependencies start to get stopped.
On Mi, 16.01.19 12:40, Christopher Cox (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote:
> I need to be able to execute a script before anything gets shutdown. That
> is, when somebody does a "reboot", "shutdown" or "poweroff", I need this
> script to run first, and for it to finish before everything gets
> whacked.
Am 17.01.19 um 06:04 schrieb Jonathon Kowalski:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:49 AM Christopher Cox wrote:
>> Adding some extra systemd clarification. Saying do this After or Before
>> other
>> service doesn't mean the start/stop completes before moving on. It may
>> execute
>> asynchronously
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:49 AM Christopher Cox wrote:
>
> On 01/16/2019 10:44 PM, Christopher Cox wrote:
> > On 01/16/2019 12:51 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> >> If you want to run it early in the shutdown process, then keep
> >> DefaultDependencies=yes, in which case it will run before the b
On 01/16/2019 10:44 PM, Christopher Cox wrote:
On 01/16/2019 12:51 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
If you want to run it early in the shutdown process, then keep
DefaultDependencies=yes, in which case it will run before the base
dependencies start to get stopped.
If you need some other resour
On 01/16/2019 12:51 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
If you want to run it early in the shutdown process, then keep
DefaultDependencies=yes, in which case it will run before the base
dependencies start to get stopped.
If you need some other resources to be up, for instance network, then add
Af
If you want to run it early in the shutdown process, then keep
DefaultDependencies=yes, in which case it will run before the base
dependencies start to get stopped.
If you need some other resources to be up, for instance network, then add
After=network.target, etc.
Remember that when shutting dow
25 matches
Mail list logo
