On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 8:02 AM Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> On 19.01.2024 20:22, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 19:12 Morten Bo Johansen
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> >>
> >>> In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows...
> >>
On 19.01.2024 20:22, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 19:12 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows...
we've
had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated
fTPM
On 19.01.2024 19:47, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows... we've
had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated fTPM
but it wasn't even mentioned until we did a BIOS update, e
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 19:12 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> > In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows...
> we've
> > had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated
> fTPM
> > but it wasn't even mentioned unti
On 2024-01-19 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> I shall try to upgrade the bios to the latest version and see
> if something shows up.
The bios was already the latest version.
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows... we've
> had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated fTPM
> but it wasn't even mentioned until we did a BIOS update, even though CPU
> spec said it should be pres
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 17:47 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Do, 18.01.24 22:53, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> ~/ % systemd-creds has-tpm2
> >> partial
> >> +firmware
> >> -driver
> >> +system
> >> +subsystem
> >> +libraries
On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 18.01.24 22:53, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
>> ~/ % systemd-creds has-tpm2
>> partial
>> +firmware
>> -driver
>> +system
>> +subsystem
>> +libraries
>
> OK, so this indicates that your system has TPM support on all levels
> wi
On Do, 18.01.24 23:40, Nils Kattenbeck (nilskem...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run,
> > > even if I don't have any TPM module. Also, I have a notifier in
> > > my waybar telling me of failed services and I don't want to see
> > > them there.
> >
>
> > They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run,
> > even if I don't have any TPM module. Also, I have a notifier in
> > my waybar telling me of failed services and I don't want to see
> > them there.
>
> Can you provide logs about this? The goal is definitely to make these
> NOPs on
On Do, 18.01.24 22:53, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> ~/ % systemd-creds has-tpm2
> partial
> +firmware
> -driver
> +system
> +subsystem
> +libraries
OK, so this indicates that your system has TPM support on all levels
with a single exception: you lack an actual linux driver f
On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> That sounds fairly recent, so I would assume that your machine has a
> TPM.
>
> Which OS is this?
Arch GNU/Linux.
~/ % uname -a
Linux gatsby 6.7.0-arch3-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat, 13 Jan
2024 14:37:14 + x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Is it possible that you
On Do, 18.01.24 22:26, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > hence, any chance you can provide logs about this? and what kind of
> > system is this? i.e. does it really lack a tpm?
>
> I shall try to accommodate you. How do I get the log?
On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> hence, any chance you can provide logs about this? and what kind of
> system is this? i.e. does it really lack a tpm?
I shall try to accommodate you. How do I get the log?
The command "systemctl --plain --no-legend list-units --state=failed"
does not pr
On Do, 18.01.24 19:43, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 Andy Pieters wrote:
>
> > Not being funny, but why care? They have got a conditional check in them
> > and will only run when it makes sense.
> > So these units will do nothing and won't delay your boot or take
On 2024-01-18 Andy Pieters wrote:
> Not being funny, but why care? They have got a conditional check in them
> and will only run when it makes sense.
> So these units will do nothing and won't delay your boot or take up
> resources
They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run,
even
Morten Bo Johansen wrote
> I have two services that are irrelevant to my system
>systemd-tpm2-setup-early.service
systemd-tpm2-setup.service
Not being funny, but why care? They have got a conditional check in them
and will only run when it makes sense.
So these units will do nothing
On 2024-01-18 Barry wrote:
> Use systemctl mask?
Seems like an interesting suggestion.
Thank you,
Morten
> On 18 Jan 2024, at 17:30, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>
> How do I get rid of them once and for all?
Use systemctl mask?
Barry
19 matches
Mail list logo
