Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7

2020-04-21 Thread Silvio Knizek
Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2020, 14:33 + schrieb Wieschke, Thomas: > Hi, > thanks fort he quick response. After having a first look at the man pages, I > mentioned that I would have a choice between > a fstab based solution or a unit file based one, right? > Because I have a mix of ~ 10 different

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7

2020-04-21 Thread Wieschke, Thomas
Nachricht- Von: systemd-devel Im Auftrag von Silvio Knizek Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2020 15:46 An: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Betreff: Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7 Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2020, 13:26 + schrieb Wieschke, Thomas: > Hi, > I hope someone ca

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7

2020-04-21 Thread Ignaz Forster
Am 21.04.20 um 15:26 Uhr schrieb Wieschke, Thomas: > I'm writing on a RH 7 system to an automounted FS and get an disruption > because systemd (??) is, > besides working in this directory, obviously trying an umount in the > background. > The umount doesn't work because the FS is in use (returned

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7

2020-04-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 21.04.20 13:26, Wieschke, Thomas (thomas.wiesc...@noventi.de) wrote: > > Hi, > I hope someone can help with the following case. > > I'm writing on a RH 7 system to an automounted FS and get an disruption > because systemd (??) is, > besides working in this directory, obviously trying an um

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd autofs in RH 7

2020-04-21 Thread Silvio Knizek
Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2020, 13:26 + schrieb Wieschke, Thomas: > Hi, > I hope someone can help with the following case. > > I'm writing on a RH 7 system to an automounted FS and get an disruption > because systemd (??) is, > besides working in this directory, obviously trying an umount in the