Re: [systemd-devel] Unit configuration for FUSE file system

2012-05-03 Thread Stef Bon
2012/5/3 Nikolaus Rath : > Stef Bon writes: >> That's why I advise to use a pidfile systemd can watch. > > I believe one of systemd's design goals is to actually get rid of pid > files and related hacks. If I want to use systemd with a pidfile, I may > just as well use systemd's sysvinit compatibi

Re: [systemd-devel] D-Bus services: automatically set Type=dbus?

2012-05-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 01.05.12 12:09, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > The wpa_supplicant service we had in Fedora shipped this dbus service file: > > ... > [D-BUS Service] > Name=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1 > SystemdService=wpa_supplicant.service > ... > and the following wpa_supplicant.service file: >

[systemd-devel] SegFaults?!

2012-05-03 Thread Sven Anders
Hello! I'm getting some SegFaults, which I can not explain. I think the problem lies somewhere in my configuration or systemd makes some assumptions and my system does not fulfill these requirements. Nevertheless, I think the tools should not SegFault but issue an error instead. By now I have no

Re: [systemd-devel] SegFaults?!

2012-05-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 03.05.12 18:14, Sven Anders (and...@anduras.de) wrote: > Hello! > > I'm getting some SegFaults, which I can not explain. I think the problem > lies somewhere in my configuration or systemd makes some assumptions and > my system does not fulfill these requirements. > > Nevertheless, I thi

[systemd-devel] [CFP] Linux Plumbers Conf Track "Boot & Base OS"

2012-05-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, Kay and I are running the "Boot & Base OS" miniconf at the Linux Plumbers Conference (San Diego) this year. We are looking for talks for it! http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2012:boot_and_base_os Are you working on boot/base OS stuff, and have something exciting to talk about? Then please

Re: [systemd-devel] SegFaults?!

2012-05-03 Thread Sven Anders
Am 03.05.2012 18:33, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Thu, 03.05.12 18:14, Sven Anders (and...@anduras.de) wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I'm getting some SegFaults, which I can not explain. I think the problem >> lies somewhere in my configuration or systemd makes some assumptions and >> my system does

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-analyze: add a --user option to support user instances

2012-05-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
--- src/analyze/systemd-analyze | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/analyze/systemd-analyze b/src/analyze/systemd-analyze index a49fbb7..ad7bd9a 100755 --- a/src/analyze/systemd-analyze +++ b/src/analyze/systemd-analyze @@ -69,9 +69,9 @

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-analyze: add a --user option to support user instances

2012-05-03 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
Thanks Patrick, this is exactly what I needed. Lennert, Kay - this will make pretty graphs of the user session startup. I've posted an example of the output here: http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/systemd-user-2.svg Auke > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Patrick McCarty < > patrick.mcca...@linux

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: clarify _TRANSPORT

2012-05-03 Thread Shawn Landden
"resp." where it was confuses reader that stdout and stderr might go to differn't places Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden --- man/systemd.journal-fields.xml |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml b/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml ind

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: clarify _TRANSPORT

2012-05-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 03.05.12 15:19, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote: > "resp." where it was confuses reader that stdout and stderr might go to > differn't places Thanks, applied! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel maili

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-analyze: add a --user option to support user instances

2012-05-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 03.05.12 13:42, Patrick McCarty (patrick.mcca...@linux.intel.com) wrote: Heya, thanks fo the patch! If have commited this now, but I believe this could use some love still. For example, it makes little sense to show the grey kenrel/initrd/userspace bars for the user session. Also, we prob

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-analyze: switch to python getopt for argument parsing

2012-05-03 Thread Shawn Landden
this uses gnu style getopt, so you can put the opts at the end: (e.g.) systemd-analyze blame --user --- src/analyze/systemd-analyze | 38 -- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/analyze/systemd-analyze b/src/analyze/systemd-analy

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-analyze: switch to python getopt for argument parsing

2012-05-03 Thread Shawn Landden
this uses gnu style getopt, so you can put the opts at the end: (e.g.) systemd-analyze blame --user v2 --- src/analyze/systemd-analyze | 56 ++- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/analyze/systemd-analyze b/src/analyze/syst