RE: Cheaters

2003-10-07 Thread Michael Contopoulos
no... what proves he is not a freak of nature is the fact that his name is not Gebreselassie, El Gueruej, Tergat, Komen, Coe, Kipketer. When he runs 12:39, 26:22, 2:04, 1:41... and runs those type of times for years, I'll call him a freak of nature. Conway, if you don't agree with me that is fi

t-and-f: [Fwd: CHICAGO: Bonus incentive for Americans

2003-10-07 Thread Mike Prizy
Original Message Subject: NEWS RELEASE - CHICAGO MARATHON Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:28:28 -0500 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon press release. LASALLE BANK CHICAGO MARATHON TO OFFER BONUS INCENTIVE FOR AMERICAN OLYMPIC HOPEFULS Up to

RE: Cheaters

2003-10-07 Thread Conway Hill
Simply because some athletes have performed at a certain level for a long period of time does NOT mean they too could not be doping .. Just doing so for a long period of time is all - if they are at all ... Not trying to be sarcastic, just pointing something out - the selectivity of finger pointing

t-and-f: Study: Can Coffee Improve Your Performance?

2003-10-07 Thread Mike Prizy
Can Coffee Improve Your Performance? "A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia has found evidence that caffeine taken prior to exercise can lessen the muscle pain experienced during intense exercise. In the past research has shown that caffeine improves endurance duri

RE: Cheaters

2003-10-07 Thread Conway Hill
Timely because ?? Just another positive test ... Does that prove he is NOT a freak of nature ??? Conway Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin J. Dixon Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cheaters

2003-10-07 Thread Martin J. Dixon
How timely. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/athletics/3171878.stm Conway Hill wrote: > Now if that isn't straddling the fence I don't know what is .. Let's > see, most athletes are on something .. Especially those at the top .. > But wait .. Those at the very top (the stars) aren't on anything ca

RE: Cheaters

2003-10-07 Thread Conway Hill
Now if that isn't straddling the fence I don't know what is .. Let's see, most athletes are on something .. Especially those at the top .. But wait .. Those at the very top (the stars) aren't on anything cause they are just "freaks of nature" !! So we get to accuse everybody, except those we like .

Re: t-and-f: who would use drugs?

2003-10-07 Thread alan tobin
The article was "Over the Edge" and I think it was in 1995 or 1996. Great timing, right before the Atlanta Olympics. Alan From: Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: who would use drugs? Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:29:12