Re: t-and-f: Borzov & performance enhancers.

Of course I was going to respond, you thought I would not? While I always enjoy the flow of information, and the adding to my reading list, your suggested contributions would add very little to my pursuits.  The very knowledge you wish me to acquire, is the very same information I will always atte

t-and-f: Twelve Days of Christmas

I think I first saw this when someone posted it on this list several years ago. I wish I knew who, so I could give due credit. To those who have seen it before, I apologize for the duplication. For those who haven't--enjoy. And to all, a happy, happy holiday season! (If things don't line up quite

Fwd: RE: t-and-f: re: interesting article on changes in the walks

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: RE: t-and-f: re: interesting article on changes in the walks Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 01:04:59 + From: Michael Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi P.N. I understand if you don't want to answer my questions. Happy Christmas and 2001. Mike On Sat

RE: t-and-f: How good was a 10.07 100m in 1972.

I believe he will be the first ever regular sub10.00 athletes > of non-african ancestry. > > regards > Steve Bennett > http://www.oztrack.com > > Some of us purists still believe we're ALL of African ancestry. malmo

RE: t-and-f: How good was a 10.07 100m in 1972.

10.07 in 1972 with Highly Developed Training methods is pretty ordinary when you compare this to the fact that Matt Shirvington of Australia at age 20 ran 10.03 in the final of the Commonwealth Games in Kuala Lumpur into a slight headwind (-0.4). Matt at the time was still much weaker in the Gym

Re: t-and-f: How good was a 10.07 100m in 1972.

- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >so what we have surmised is that the US is blamed for everything, no matter >what the reasons. Foreign athletes and scientist come to the States for l>ife, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the countries they leave >blame U.S. >And

t-and-f: Borzov & performance enhancers.

<> Dear listers: I enjoy this list on occasion, particularly some of the posts on Borzov and the German program. However, I find a lot of GARBAGE like the above to be utterly useless. The first half of the message FAR undershot the rhetorical target. The second is better spent on a search eng

Re: t-and-f: How good was a 10.07 100m in 1972.

So what we have surmised is that the US is blamed for everything, no matter what the reasons.  Foreign athletes and scientist come to the States for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the countries they leave blame U.S.   And they say we have propaganda... BUT, you all may be correct.

t-and-f: The ugly Australian

Garry Hill wrote: Isn't that [marooning all the crims on a desert island and letting them slug it out . . .] how we got Australia? I thought you as a Kiwi would realize that! gh -- Yeah, we used to point that out. But not now that all the Ocker icons are really Kiwi

t-and-f: Our kind of posts

Wasn't it a BBC announcer who commented at the presentation of trophies after an Oxford-Cambridge boat race, "Now isn't that sweet. The wife of the Cambridge captain is kissing the cox of the Oxford crew." previously on this show: Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:40:41 +000

Re: t-and-f: How good was a 10.07 100m in 1972.

From: Kurt Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mats asked us to remember: > > >Remeber that the USSR and the GDR imported their doping science > > > Hardly. The US is certainly not innocent in furthering doping science, but > a significant majority of the synthetic steroid compounds used in doping > were

t-and-f: Los Gatos, 19 August

Liberian Olympian sprinter Grace Dinkins claims a 100m time of 11.53 sec at Los Gatos, 19 August. Can someone please confirm that mark? Thank you. Winfried Kramer Kohlrodweg 12 66539 Neunkirchen/Germany Association of Track & Field Statisticians Editor of NATIONAL ATHLETICS RECORDS