gh wrote:
> Brian McEwen writes:
>>Tell me that you believe a 16 year old can run 8:19 or 27:43 (as the
records would have you believe) and I will shut >> up.
>No, i don't believe it. But then, I don't believe anybody of any age can
run 12:39 or 26:22 either!
>
> How do you think the rest of the
The NCAA meet will be one week later than right now, running from Weds-Sat
as always. The regionals will be held one week prior to the current NCAA
weekend, meaning 11-15 days before the new NCAA date, depending on event.
This date for the regional is currently a non-competition weekend. The week
> Although it is correct that most all-Americans are qualifying anyway, even
> if they are from bad weather areas, I suspect that every year 3-5 possible
> All-American distance runners fail to qualify. I've rarely run a track
meet
> in New England before May, for example, where the wind wasn't a
Roger and others,
In the 800's (and some other races as well) I was surprised at how rare
people finishing with the same time was. Granted, two people separated by
1/1000th of a second could have different time (e.g., 1:59.490 to 1:59.491)
but it is not likely. More surprising to me was the first
