urray
www.texastrack.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of malmo
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 11:37 AM
To: rcjennings; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Neville Hodge 10.96 M45 called legit
Place-grading and time-grading is still most accurat
anemometers) everything was O.K.
>
> Roger (not even a sub-master yet)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL
Walt wrote:
> Ken,
> David Honea is not the only one that goes "ballistic" when you publish
> these "age-graded" comparisons. In my opinion, you do a disservice to
masters
> athletes when you do this, since most "serious" track fans laugh at the
> numbers.
I am as strong a proponent of age grad
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Neville Hodge 10.96 M45 called legit
In a message dated 5/4/1 5:13:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<>
Ke
In a message dated 5/4/1 5:13:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<>
Ken,
David Honea is not the only one that goes "ballistic" when you publish
these "age-graded" comparisons. In my opinion, you do a disservice to masters
athletes when you do this, since most "serious" track fans laugh at the
Y ask Y:
Phil Felton, a trackside witness to the masters sprints at Penn, reports that
the negative wind reading and time for Neville Hodge in the M45 100 was
legitimate -- and that paperwork is being filed for a WR in his age group:
10.96. That's a 10.1 on the Age-Graded Tables (for sake of
