RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

onsidered the Olympic record-holder with her 10.62 from a qualifying >round the day before the final. > >-Original Message- >From: Robert Hersh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:08 AM >To: THOMAS,Graham; t-and-f >Subject: RE: t-and-f: Guess

RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

In a message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2001 5:52:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, "THOMAS,Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: << Err.. windy marks can be Olympic records. Flo-Jo's 10.54w IS the Olympic record.>> Strangely enough, on a quick search, I can't find a source I'd consider to be 100% definitiv

RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

before the final. -Original Message- From: Robert Hersh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:08 AM To: THOMAS,Graham; t-and-f Subject: RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE Message text written by "THOMAS,Graham" >Perhaps they have just dismissed

RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

l. -Original Message- From: Robert Hersh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:08 AM To: THOMAS,Graham; t-and-f Subject: RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE Message text written by "THOMAS,Graham" >Perhaps they have just dismissed the 10.49 from

RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

Message text written by "THOMAS,Graham" >Perhaps they have just dismissed the 10.49 from the books < I think it's more likely that they were referring to the Olympic record, rather than the World record. At least that was my guess when I read the piece originally. (No, I am not in the habit of

RE: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

go.com/~oztrack/ -Original Message- From: Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2001 2:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE Jim wrote: > > In a message dated 1/9/01 3:08:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writ

Re: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

Jim wrote: > > In a message dated 1/9/01 3:08:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >Never let it be said that a magazine like this lets historical accuracy > >get in the way of bombast. > > > Aah, chick mags, what do they know anyway? > Perhaps they have the inside story on the Indianapolis race

Re: t-and-f: Guess who on the cover of VOGUE

In a message dated 1/9/01 3:08:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Never let it be said that a magazine like this lets historical accuracy >get in the way of bombast. > Aah, chick mags, what do they know anyway? Jim Gerweck Running Times