You're talking about specific coaches, whereas I'm talking about averages
(Entine?). The question is not which level produces the best (and worst)
athletes, but which is most likely to produce the most improvement. If
you have two similar motivated athletes, one with less developed talent,
than
>Of course, it's a bit of a catch-22 as the athletes that "slip" to the
>DIII level are a little less likely to have peaked at an early age and
>might have more room for improvement, thus making the coaching success
>rate look markedly better.
>
>Dan
Dan,
Sorry, but I have to strongly disagree he
Of course, it's a bit of a catch-22 as the athletes that "slip" to the
DIII level are a little less likely to have peaked at an early age and
might have more room for improvement, thus making the coaching success
rate look markedly better.
Dan
--- Ed Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I we
I moved down in distance from high school to college. I soon discovered that
the "fast" guys weren't so fast after all. ;-)
Amazing what hard work, focus, and a little luck can do for you.
malmo
> I wonder if this is because a lot of these guys "move up"` in distance
> because they feel they a
GHTFNedit wrote:
So how does that fit into the equation ???>>
>
> The coaching/team situation at Stanford now is different than it was just
a
> few years ago and certainly different than at other schools where one
> receives "good coaching."
>
Agreed .. Lannana is one of the best .. But shouldn'
Brian wrote:
> I could name a bunch, but won't because I know you all can too.
>
> Turn it around to look at the guys who end up ACTUALLY moving to a very
high
> level in College and internationally and you see many who were "second
tier"
> nationally. Many of them were not "great" HS'ers. Look
Conning said:
I believe there are two reasons
for the lack of improvement by high school runners: 1) maturity and 2)
outstanding high school coaching. Dale Scott (El Cerrito High School, CA
1972), who ran 1:48.5n for 880 yards, was a fully-mature man in high
school. He also
GHTFNedit wrote:
> A private poster offered this analysis to me:
>
> < school-- grades! How many superstars in college and post-college went
> through the junior college system? Off hand I can think of Calvin and
Alvin,
> but not many others. William Reed went to a top academic school
(Morehou
Brian wrote:
> This indeed does seem to be the case (the top-level HS girls continuing at
> that level compared to a smaller rate of top-end HS boys who are able to
> persist there).
>
> One of the reasons that has nothing to do with physiology or maturation is
> that many Top-10 type HS sprinter
A private poster offered this analysis to me:
<>
Add Mo Greene to the JC file.
gh
> If I were I high school athlete I'd run away from such a coach
> and seek out
> one who had statistics of 100% of their athletes getting PR's
> each season,
> with almost all ending up with very significant improvement by the end of
> their collegiate career.
If I were a high school athlete I'
My personal theory of why the lack of improvement in college is that too many
Div. I colleges hire coaches more for their recruiting ability than for their
coaching ability. How many Div. I coaches try to recruit high school athletes
with tales of how many championships they've won or how many
Netter
Brian wrote:
> Paul Thomas said that College was over before he realized he had "pissed
> away" (his words) a lot of good years.
>
I know Paul Tomas too. I met him when I worked at PR Bar. He said
the same thing to me out at a bar:). Thing about Paul is that while a
great runner he
st of us have seen this or participated.
-Brian McEwen
-Original Message-
From: Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improvement
Rohl wrote:
> Netters
>
> Dan asked:
&
2001 3:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improvement
Netters
Dan wrote:
> Somehow I don't think 4:10 milers belong in the same conversation as 45
> second 400 runners. One could argue that any 4:10 type belongs among the
> second tier group -- not
--- "Mcewen, Brian T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the reasons that has nothing to do with physiology or maturation
> is that many Top-10 type HS sprinters (male) very often play football
> as well.
That sounds like as good an explanation as any.
--- Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Je
In a message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:14:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
"Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< Michael Stember who was on the Olympic Team at 1500 was from a high school
here in Northern California - Jesuit in Sacramento .. Their honor role for
milers reads like a Who's Who of h
PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 5, 2001 5:07:27 PM GMT
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improvement
Rohl wrote:
> Netters
>
> Dan asked:
> > Is this evident in any group other than male sprinters?
>
>
> yes Distance runners.
This
is what is scary about the potential of Dathan Ritzenhein. He just turned
18 (12/30/00) so he cannot compete as a junior athlete when he is a college
frosh. But, he reportedly is aiming for the World junior XC Championships
(and the trials of course) in February and March.
He is
on
Rohl wrote:
> Netters
>
> Dan asked:
> > Is this evident in any group other than male sprinters?
>
>
> yes Distance runners. In 83 there was Miles Irish, Mike Starr and John
> Carrolitti all sub 4:10 milers in H.S. Of the group the only one to make
> to the 88 and 92 trials was Charles Marsella
In a message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2001 9:53:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bruce
Lehane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< The original question is why doesn't the 45 second high school 400 meter
runner not go on to run 44's or 43's later in his career. I suggest that it
has primarily to do with social/
ursday, January 04, 2001 9:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improvement
At 08:02 PM 01/04/2001 EST, Geoff Thurner wrote:
>Michael Granville??? Speaking of UCLA athletes, what ever happened to Kim
>Mortensen?
She got a back injury as sophomore. The last p
nd are at 47-48 at 17-18. How your
progression looks to the fans is all in how fast you reach your peak.
-Brian McEwen
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improv
Netters
Dan wrote:
> Somehow I don't think 4:10 milers belong in the same conversation as 45
> second 400 runners. One could argue that any 4:10 type belongs among the
> second tier group -- not the group the original question was inquiring
> about.
True Dan. I don't disagree at all. But the
The original question is why doesn't the 45 second high school 400 meter
runner not go on to run 44's or 43's later in his career. I suggest that it
has primarily to do with social/psychological issues. The early maturity
that contributed to his dominance in high school no longer works to his
ad
In a message dated 1/4/01 11:53:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< This ephemerality of fame is also pronounced in 800 meter runners. Has any
HS record holder in the event ever had even a successful college career? >>
Two exceptions would be John Marshall and George Kersh. Marshall set an
ind
<>
Her back injury and other physical problems were symptoms of her eating
disorder. She quit the sport altogether and majored in music.
Arr!
Dale
The fall off of top HS athletes is not confined to the sprints, it is a common occurrence across the board. There are hundreds of names we all could bring up in this discussion.
I think it due to physical maturity. The common term is "man-child". From my elementary physiology women mature faster
Somehow I don't think 4:10 milers belong in the same conversation as 45
second 400 runners. One could argue that any 4:10 type belongs among the
second tier group -- not the group the original question was inquiring
about.
Dan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> yes Distance runners. In 83 there wa
llege. My
theory is that they were more interested in fast cars.
David Lesley
--
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why the lack of improvement
>Date: Thu, Jan 4, 2001, 1:23 PM
>
>Netters
>
>Dan asked:
>> Is this evident in
We may be victims of a logical fallacy. We may not see the variations of
non-number one athletes as clearly as we see the variations of the number
one. We may not notice when, for example, number 4 goes to 5 but quickly
notice when number one is no longer number one. After all, from the top
ther
Netters
Dan asked:
> Is this evident in any group other than male sprinters?
yes Distance runners. In 83 there was Miles Irish, Mike Starr and John
Carrolitti all sub 4:10 milers in H.S. Of the group the only one to make
to the 88 and 92 trials was Charles Marsella a guy who was second to
--- Bruce Lehane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> High school leaders are adulated past reason. Their exploits are
> trumpeted beyond their due and this puts those individuals in a very
> vulnerable spot when they have to move up to the next level of
> competition, where they get battered around rout
At 08:02 PM 01/04/2001 EST, Geoff Thurner wrote:
>Michael Granville??? Speaking of UCLA athletes, what ever happened to Kim
>Mortensen?
She got a back injury as sophomore. The last performance I have for her is
8th place at the Chile Pepper XC 18-Oct-1997. The following article ran in
the UC
High school leaders are adulated past reason. Their exploits are trumpeted beyond
their due and this puts those individuals in a very vulnerable spot when they have to
move up to the next level of competition, where they get battered around routinely.
The next level of high school runners have a
Michael Granville??? Speaking of UCLA athletes, what ever happened to Kim
Mortensen?
Ryan
In a message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2001 2:04:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
"Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< Talking about West and Mack, and Sanford and Green gave rise to a question
. Why is that
Could the reason be that these second tier athletes have a greater desire to
succeed. People tend to work harder to get to the top, but some of us tend to
get complacent after we reach what we believe is the top. The gifted athletes
usually do not have to work as hard to reach the top.
At the a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is it the same story for the HS girls? It seems like the top talent
> > there is more likely to remain the top talent.>>
>
> Flameout rate on the women's side is far higher, is my guess.
>
> But in looking quickly at this year's top 10s in the 100: men had
> 7
Jimmie asked:
>Concerning your question, could it be resources that have caused some are
best
>athletes to under achieve? During past threads there have been many
comments on
>training facilities, hours available to train, finances, and so forth and
so on.
Could be, could be expectations, an
In a message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2001 6:25:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, Dan
Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< That wouldn't explain why the "second tier" of HS sprint talent tends to
rise to the top, which was Conway's question. We're talking about people
coming out of the same system (presum
--- Jimmie Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could it be resources that have caused some are best
> athletes to under achieve? During past threads there have been many
> comments on training facilities, hours available to train, finances,
> and so forth and so on.
That wouldn't explain why the
In a message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2001 5:47:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
"Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<>
Answer to that seems easy to me. One consideration is that the superstars you
cite belong to a class of outliers who simply peak at a very young age.
More likely is the fact that the
Jimmie Manning wrote:
> There may be some question concerning the success of Tony Darden. He was
an
> Olympic qualifier, but someone (President Carter) decided to mix athletics
with
> politics. He also beat the Cuban great (Juan ??spelling) in the Pan Am
Games. I
> believe that would be like so
There may be some question concerning the success of Tony Darden. He was an
Olympic qualifier, but someone (President Carter) decided to mix athletics with
politics. He also beat the Cuban great (Juan ??spelling) in the Pan Am Games. I
believe that would be like someone beating M. Johnson in a p
There may be some question concerning the success of Tony Darden. He was an
Olympic qualifier, but someone (President Carter) decided to mix athletics with
politics. He also beat the Cuban great (Juan ??spelling) in the Pan Am Games. I
believe that would be like someone beating M. Johnson in a p
45 matches
Mail list logo