RE: t-and-f: a historical breakthrough for Ndereba

2001-10-08 Thread Post, Marty
No seperate start for men and women. When asked about her relatively slow start at the post-race press conference, Ndereba said she simply missed the first two mile markers and thought she was running faster than she was. She did see mile 3 (17:11) which was "only" about 2:30 pace so she quickly

Re: t-and-f: a historical breakthrough for Ndereba

2001-10-08 Thread Michael Rohl
Netters Marty wrote: > Astonishing that her 3rd 5 miles was an even 2 minutes faster than her > first. A better pace in the start and she coulda been sub-2:18. No. More likely she would have run 2-3 minutes slower. The way she did it is the right way to run the race. Thanks for the great sta

Re: t-and-f: a historical breakthrough for Ndereba

2001-10-07 Thread JimRTimes
In a message dated 10/7/01 6:46:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotes: >> Astonishing that her 3rd 5 miles was an even 2 minutes faster >> than her first. A better pace in the start and she coulda >> been sub-2:18. >> Catherine has been the queen of the negative split marathon, and this run is no