|
SD wrote
"If you do get
rid of some of the existing marks, what marks do you use for the
world records? Do you go back to the original mark bettered by the current world record? What about all the marks in between the old world record and the current? There's a strong likelihood that those athletes were not drug tested since it wasn't a world record at the time, even though they could be clean marks also." We aren't
talking about those marks. We're talking about known dirty marks that have been
admitted to. Whatever the fall-out is from that is irrelevant. Not knowing
whether other marks are dirty is no reason not to expunge known dirty marks. I
won't even comment on the point that if dirty marks are removed that it will be
difficult to construct some kind if list. That's GH's
problem.
Regards,
Martin
Millard, Rouse &
Rosebrugh
Martin J. Dixon, B. Math. (Hons), C.A., Partner
Chartered Accountants Direct Dial: (519) 759-3708 Ext. 231 P.O. Box 367, 96 Nelson Street Private Facsimile: (519) 759-8548 Brantford, Ontario N3T 5N3 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: (519) 759-3511 Web site: www.millards.com Practice Areas: www.millards.com/htm/profs/m_mjdixo.htm IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email may be confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender. |
