t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton

2001-05-12 Thread Ed Grant
Netterrs:       Glacning through results of the Golden Spikes races at Princeton today, I was surprised to see, buried in the women's mile field, Erin Donohie of Haddonfield at 3:47.41. She evidently skipped today's Camden County meet in her quest for a state HS record in the event. How

Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton

2001-05-13 Thread JimRTimes
In a message dated 5/12/01 9:44:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >She evidently skipped today's Camden County meet in her quest for a state >HS record in the event. NJ must be enlightened - in CT they wouldn't accept a mark if it wasn't run in a state HS meet. Jim Gerweck Running Times

Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton

2001-05-13 Thread Reuben Frank
Actually, it's not NJ that's enlightened, it's Ed. His records are considered official by everybody in the state (coaches, writers, athletes, state officials), so if he says something is a record and he lists it in the NJ Track Annual (published since 1966) as a record, it IS a record. > NJ

Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton

2001-05-13 Thread DJCRibeye
In a message dated 5/13/01 8:46:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << NJ must be enlightened - in CT they wouldn't accept a mark if it wasn't run in a state HS meet. >> I do not believe that this statement is true. I believe in Connecticut that they will accept a mark a