Sounds like a choice between chocolate covered marshmallow or mud covered
marshmallow to me :-)
-Buck
-Original Message-
From: ghill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:00 PM
To: track list
Subject: Re: t-and-f: El Guerrouj's kick
> From: Dan Kaplan
> From: Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: El Guerrouj's kick
>
> Why not take Greene's speed and Khannouchi's
--- Marco Velediaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they wrote in 1998: "A combination of Coe's speed and either
> Scott's (Steve) or Morceli's stamina suggests a sub-3:40 mile
> time (and 3:22-3:23/1500 m)is definitely possible..."
I haven't read Run With The Best, so maybe this is addressed (bu
Australian coach Tony Benson wrote about a figure that links an athlete's
speed and endurance called "stamina indicator" in the excellent book "Run
with the best" (co-author Irv Ray), among other things they wrote in 1998:
"A combination of Coe's speed and either Scott's (Steve) or Morceli'
"'t-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: t-and-f: El Guerrouj's kick
>Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:46:58 -0400
>
>Maybe it comes from being 4 years older, but El Guerrouj certainly doesn't
>seem to have the finishing
I have a wild another of my wild theories: Could it possibly be that 2:44:75
did him in?
malmo
>Maybe it comes from being 4 years older, but El Guerrouj certainly doesn't
>seem to have the finishing kick now that he did in 1998. Not that the last
>300 in Rieti was exactly slow, but compare it
I have a wild another of my wild theories: Could it possibly be that 2:44:75
did him in?
malmo
>Maybe it comes from being 4 years older, but El Guerrouj certainly doesn't
>seem to have the finishing kick now that he did in 1998. Not that the last
>300 in Rieti was exactly slow, but compare it
>Maybe it comes from being 4 years older, but El Guerrouj certainly doesn't
>seem to have the finishing kick now that he did in 1998. Not that the last
>300 in Rieti was exactly slow, but compare it to his world record:
>
>Rome '98: 2:46.34 @ 1200m + 39.66 last 300m = 3:26.00
>Rieti '02: 2:44.75 @
Maybe it comes from being 4 years older, but El Guerrouj certainly doesn't
seem to have the finishing kick now that he did in 1998. Not that the last
300 in Rieti was exactly slow, but compare it to his world record:
Rome '98: 2:46.34 @ 1200m + 39.66 last 300m = 3:26.00
Rieti '02: 2:44.75 @ 1200m