--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hi, Dan,
> 
> You might remember that, a couple of months ago, I tried, in vain, to
> post to 
> the t&f group, and that something in AOL and my settings was blocking my
> access.  Might I ask you to do me a favor, please.  I'd like to post the
> following to the group, and if you would be so kind as to send it
> through, I'd very much appreciate it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Don Schlesinger
> 
> Two comments about Montgomery's less-than-perfect start: 1) As he
> stated, a 
> "perfect" start is far from simply who moved first, as judged by
> reaction 
> time.  Now, it is clear that, if all the mechanics that follow are also 
> correct, it would best to react in .104, and not .184 (!), but there's
> more 
> to the start than pushing off the pedal.  So, by Montgomery's own
> admission, 
> his initial thrust was not sufficiently horizontal, meaning, quite
> simply, 
> that he didn't stay low enough long enough, thereby killing some of his 
> initial horizontal velocity.  Indeed, he could have done better.
> 2) Again, by his own admission -- and something I saw clearly in the
> replay 
> -- he did a strange thing with his left arm, kind of stopping it, or
> pulling 
> it back, right at the outset, rather than thrusting it vigorously
> forward, in 
> one sweeping motion.  But, what no one has mentioned so far was his 
> explanation as to WHY he did this.  In his own words, he was quoted as
> saying 
> that he thought the race was going to be called back!  Now, I hate to
> stir 
> the pot again, but it seemed pretty clear to me that no other competitor
> 
> broke in the race (and, by the rules, Montgomery didn't, either), so why
> do 
> you think Tim made that comment, unless a) he knew he had guessed, or 
> anticipated, the starter, and b) he thought he hadn't gotten away with
> it, 
> and "flinched" ever so slightly at the start?  As always, we'll never
> know, 
> will we?
> 
> Bottom line:  A record isn't going to be broken in the rain, with the
> wind 
> blowing in your face.  It's going to be broken under ideal conditions
> and 
> with a superb performance by an exceptional athlete.  All of those 
> stipulations were met in Paris.  Congratulations to Tim.  My personal
> opinion 
> is that he guessed, but the record was set under perfectly "normal" 
> circumstances, which is a lot more than we can say for the women's 100
> record!
> 
> Don Schlesinger


=====
http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy T&F
------------------------------------------------------------
  @    o      Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <|\/ <^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\      (503)370-9969 phone/fax
   /   /

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com

Reply via email to