t-and-f: Then and now

2000-09-23 Thread Tom Murrell
I would be interested in seeing a comparison of marks of the qualifiers in the US trials with their OLY performances. I wouldn't be a pretty picture in most cases. Tom

Re: t-and-f: Then and now

2000-09-23 Thread Conway
> I would be interested in seeing a comparison of marks of the qualifiers in > the US trials with their OLY performances. I wouldn't be a pretty picture in > most cases. > Agreed ... There definitely seems to be a drop off so far .. Mo, Marion, MJ, Drummond, Dragila .. Seem to be where they were

Re: t-and-f: Then and now

2000-09-23 Thread R.T.
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 11:25:50 -0700, you wrote: >> I would be interested in seeing a comparison of marks of the qualifiers in >> the US trials with their OLY performances. I wouldn't be a pretty picture >in >> most cases. >> > >Agreed ... There definitely seems to be a drop off so far .. Mo, Mario

Re: t-and-f: Then and now

2000-09-23 Thread Ed & Dana Parrot
> ...somebody predicted last week that there wouldn't be any WRs in Sydney, and > cited the reasons. Appears to be right on the mark... > > ...given those same reasons, Zelezny's OR is VERY impressive...something this > distance-dominated list probably doesn't pick up on too quick... What is the

Re: t-and-f: Then and now

2000-09-23 Thread Michael Rohl
Netters Conway wrote > .. Shot putters definitely dropped . Ot results:Olympic Results 1 664 Adam Nelson Nike 22.12m 21.21 2 443 CJ Hunter Nike 21.87m Out with injury 3 89 Andy Bloom Nike