Re: t-and-f: What's Embarrassing?

2001-10-10 Thread Michael J. Roth
To be more specific, Curt Clausen's finishes in the last 3 Majors (2 WCs & 1 OG) have been higher than any US male over 400m. MJR

Re: t-and-f: What's Embarrassing?

2001-10-09 Thread Michael Rohl
Netters Roger Ruth wrote: > Apparently, on the basis of representation in the world's top 100 rankings > in their events, walkers did not perform better internationally than > steeplers, or in the other comparisons made, with the exception of the > marathon. RR I didn't really agree with Allen's

Re: t-and-f: What's Embarrassing?

2001-10-08 Thread Roger Ruth
Yesterday, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, >In defense of the walk though, I do have to say this, at least the >walkers have consistently performed better at the distance events than >our running brethren. Since I don't know much about the current state of either race walking or distance running, I was

RE: t-and-f: What's Embarrassing?

2001-10-08 Thread malmo
> > Adding to another subject High mileage is a myth. I rarely ever did junk miles in my > training. You've got it bass-ackwards. Junk mileage is the myth. malmo

t-and-f: What's Embarrassing?

2001-10-07 Thread altda
I know I might be a bit late on this, but I feel I must defend myself. If you think its embarrassing to have Michelle ranked 6th, how about an a guy doing 20 miles per week not 200(k or mi) getting bumped to 8th if you put her into the mix. Yeah, that's right, I'm deeply offended that I'm not mo