done! added AjaxStaleSession page to prevent doctype in ajax response.changed AjaxExceptionPresenter to let StaleSessionException use it too.make stale session check after response builder setup.
On 12/5/05, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aghh, whatever's easiest I guess? Didn't know tape
Ok, I think we'd need you to dump the Hibernate part since everything
you can do with Hibernate can be done with simple Pojos and wired lists,
right?
What's exactly the difference between this example and the standard
example? I mean, what do you see is lacking in the standard examples?
--
I
Leo,
Here's the URL:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9138094&forum_id=32618.
It's kindof a long read and most of all it does not work but you'll get
the idea ;)
Kind regards,
Dennis Fleurbaaij
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T: (0031) (0) 6 54 21 53 65
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
I'
the updateComponents parameter expects a collection . Normally we set
it like this : updateComponents="ognl:{ 'yourId' , 'anotherId' }" .
Allthogh I havn't tried this yet , it seems logical for you to be able
to set updateComponents="ognl:myCollection" . Then you can manipulate
the collection in y
Anyone have a solution for this?
I use 2 instances of a component on a page. This component has an AjaxForm (search) and a @Any component. I want the form's updateComponents to include the @Any to refresh it.
How can I get the ID of the @Any id without implicitly naming it (so as not to ha
Hello!
I've tried to write a simple tree in tacos on the source of the
TacosDemo application, but when I click the expand button nothing
happens the URL changes, but the root remain closed. I think I miss
something, but I couldn't figure out what. I paste here my code, maybe
someone can help me:
yea , that's some ideea , the browser vendors providing developers
with unit testing libs specific to their browsers ! Woudln't that be
nice
On 12/5/05, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think htmlunit has the most promise.It uses the mozilla supplied rhino
> javascript engine, and is
I think htmlunit has the most promise.It uses the mozilla supplied rhino _javascript_ engine, and is actually capable of emulating most of the various browser quircks. It's not currently compatible with dojo, but it's so close that it may merit some real effort to get working. It's on my list of to
I know , and that would involve us , knowing what works with MSIE ,
probably better than the MSIE guys do :)
I've allwais said that the stupidest thing the FF guys could do , is
not try to first emulate MSIE behaviour 100% , then improove , this
way allowing MSIE users a smooth migration . And i'm
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
Dumb no ... more optimistic than me trying to create ajax only webapps
with tacos alpha ... maybe ...
How would you simulate each browsers bugs in the unit tests ?
Well basically unit testing involves expecting a certain answer from the
components? So, if you know that X
Well as soon as you get the link throw it around here to see if it can
help other developers. The Tacos community would appreciate it ;).
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo,
I'm currenly trying to implement an ajax tree, but that is not as trivi
Dumb no ... more optimistic than me trying to create ajax only webapps
with tacos alpha ... maybe ...
How would you simulate each browsers bugs in the unit tests ?
On 12/5/05, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a matter of fact, we would include unit test for each browser.
I'm using the tree with a very large hibernate based data source. It's something I want to introduce, but then I'd have to expose my hivemind hibernate services, which if anyone discovers them makes me very very afraid. (Support-wise..)
On 12/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leon
As a matter of fact, we would include unit test for each browser. But
maybe that's just a dumb idea, and unit testing javascript is
impossible. But well.. anyway, JS sucks...
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
I simply can't see , how one could do Unit testing
I simply can't see , how one could do Unit testing on an Ajax app ,
and not only Ajax , but Ajax with Dojo components ... ... ...
Just the browser differences to me make this impossible ... For
example how would you root out the TextArea bug with a unit test . It
works in MSIE and the returned htm
Leonardo,
I'm currenly trying to implement an ajax tree, but that is not as trivial
one might initially expect :) I've noticed some other Tacos-starters
having problems with this too so I've posted a rather long introcution for
an Ajax Tree that uses locations on earth to fill it.
Sourceforge is
I'm waiting for beta-1, I'll do the database refactoring, and then let's
see about the Ajax Tree component examples.
Non-filetree-but-database model driven examples? Could you elaborate,
please?
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
---
We actually need unit tests. Now *THAT* would be a welcome contribution
Cosmin!
(I really have no clue how to test Tapestry apps. Anyone who teaches me
without traumatizing me would be my new best friend)
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
A few of them defi
Leonardo,
Maybe you could include the non-filetree-but-database model driven
examples of the Ajax Tree component while you're at it :)? Sure would
save me a lot of grief to have a simpler example.
Furthermore I think the rewriting of the demo with more T4-happyness is a
good idea, but hey I'm ju
A few of them definently , but the one last night would beat them all
. To give you an ideea , I had a method which would set the
style.display property of two html elements in 4 places .
Like that the Application / Page ( since as Jesse said , everything I
do with tacos is put in a single page wh
Wow, Cosmin... you're like the uber-tester here, right?
How many strange bugs have you caught? Maybe we should do a contest,
hehe ;)
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
Thank you Tim you just saved me 30 minutes of making a broken demo page :)
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Thank you Tim you just saved me 30 minutes of making a broken demo page :)
On 12/5/05, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two users are certainly more powerful than one :) Ok, I will see if I can
> fix it.
>
>
> On 12/5/05, Tim Downey < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've seen
LOL, nope. Though I was waiting for beta-1 to show up before doing it.
(yeah I know - too lazy to make a branch)
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
None here, just so long as said friendlyness doesn't require me to
write a lot of new code ;)
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
---
None here, just so long as said friendlyness doesn't require me to write a lot of new code ;)On 12/5/05, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,I'd like to refactor the demo making it use Friendly URLs and other
Tapestry 4.0's goodness (except annotations). Any objections?--Ing. Le
Hi,
I'd like to refactor the demo making it use Friendly URLs and other
Tapestry 4.0's goodness (except annotations). Any objections?
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you
25 matches
Mail list logo
