[Tacos-devel] beta-1 ready for testing..again

2006-02-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I can't find any major items that need to be fixed so I'd say it's ready for testing again. The stylesheet for the FloatingPane window probably needs to be adjusted so that the checkboxes (or radio buttons? ) don't appear to be like 100px wide ;) I've also got to adjust the css in a lot of other p

[Tacos-devel] tapestry4.1 work started

2006-02-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
If anyone has noticed there have been lots of weird commits on tapestry-dev with me trying to find a suitable home for dojo. Things are pretty much operational now and I think a lot of work will be happening this weekend, however slowly. I started a wiki page for ajax stuff here http://wiki.apache

Re: [Tacos-devel] Selenium and Tacos

2006-02-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Wow Andreas!! This is super duper awesome :) I kept holding out hope for htmlunit, but actually testing things in the browser is at least a little more realistic. You've done everyone working on and using tacos a great service :) Thanks againjesseOn 2/2/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [Tacos-devel] Selenium and Tacos

2006-02-02 Thread Andreas Andreou
ok, i've added these 9 tests for the moment. TestDialogWrongUsername TestDialogCorrectUsername TestSimpleTree TestEffectsRefresh TestExceptionHandle TestInlineEditBox TestProgressBar TestTree TestFloatingPane They cover all pages in the Core Components and Ajax categories. In Firefox 1.0.7 (1.5 i

Re: [Tacos-devel] trigger an ajax listener from javascript?

2006-02-02 Thread J. Joseph Benavidez
Jesse-- Thanks. I had found a AjaxFormSubmit_${formId}_${compId}_submit method from my AjaxSubmit component, and that seemed to do the trick. (Calling the postXXXForm method did not work for me.) I didn't know about the "enhanced events", though. So instead of setting an onkeypress attribute in

Re: [Tacos-devel] Selenium and Tacos

2006-02-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Cool!! On 2/2/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW, I'm in the process of adding selenium tests for Tacos Demo pages.I currently have 3 tests for the Core Components (Dialog, Simple Tree) andI'm moving to the Ajax ones now (Felix, i use the pause command when I triggeran ajax request,

Re: [Tacos-devel] beta-1 almost ready to release

2006-02-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yeah, the 4.1 work is in cvs trunk. The tapestry 4.0 stuff will keep coming out until we reach a final release. On 2/2/06, Andreas Andreou < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:don't worry!It's for 4.0Michael Waluk wrote: >Hi,>>I've lost track - but is this for Tapestry 4.0 or for a future 4.1?>>If for 4.1, w

[Tacos-devel] Selenium and Tacos

2006-02-02 Thread Andreas Andreou
BTW, I'm in the process of adding selenium tests for Tacos Demo pages. I currently have 3 tests for the Core Components (Dialog, Simple Tree) and I'm moving to the Ajax ones now (Felix, i use the pause command when I trigger an ajax request, i.e. pause 2000 to wait for 2 secs for the data to arrive

[Tacos-devel] Re: incorrect ajax reponse using blocks

2006-02-02 Thread Edgar Chan Carrillo
Sure, here is the code: The page its being activated with openDetalleUsuario() method which gets some data from a database and fills the Usuario Class. By default renders the first block usuarioBGenerales. The body of each block is on separate components (usuarioBGenerales and usuarioBRoles). The

Re: [Tacos-devel] beta-1 almost ready to release

2006-02-02 Thread Andreas Andreou
don't worry! It's for 4.0 Michael Waluk wrote: >Hi, > >I've lost track - but is this for Tapestry 4.0 or for a future 4.1? > >If for 4.1, will there be any further releases for 4.0 or was the alpha-7 >the last one? > >Thanks! >- Michael > > >On 1/31/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Tacos-devel] beta-1 almost ready to release

2006-02-02 Thread Michael Waluk
Hi,   I've lost track - but is this for Tapestry 4.0 or for a future 4.1?    If for 4.1, will there be any further releases for 4.0 or was the alpha-7 the last one?   Thanks! - Michael  On 1/31/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would go ahead and apply the fixes (hopefully the new re