thanks for your insights i have taken notes
On 3/22/06, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cosmin Bucur wrote:
> > Leonardo , I guess you bring up some very valid points , that are
> > irrelevant in my scenario ,. The applications i am trying to build
> > are ment to replace d
http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BugReporter/Bug86
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Do make sure it's all working in IE first though.
Exactly that...
Leonardo, if you are able to check the demo of latest
Michael Waluk wrote:
Hi,
I haven't dug too deep on this but noticed that when a component is
rendered in response to an AjaxDirectLink the AjaxWebRequest is found
in the cycle, but it seems to disappear when submitting an AjaxForm.
I know it is set into the cycle in AjaxDirectServiceImpl's
Ahh..That's the way I used to do it to. It is safe to simply inject the AjaxWebRequest into your component via normal hivemind injections. On 3/22/06, Michael Waluk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I haven't dug too deep on this but noticed that when a component is rendered in response to an AjaxD
Hi,
I haven't dug too deep on this but noticed that when a component is rendered in response to an AjaxDirectLink the AjaxWebRequest is found in the cycle, but it seems to disappear when submitting an AjaxForm. I know it is set into the cycle in AjaxDirectServiceImpl's service either way, but f
Yes, but i don't know if the public cvs is up-to-date.
Or you can wait a day or two for the release.
>From Cosmin Bucur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> so Andy you have checked in something that should work without that ,
> should I give it a test run then ?
>
> On 3/22/06, Cosmin Bucur <[EMAIL PROTECTED
>From Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do make sure it's all working in IE first though.
Exactly that...
Leonardo, if you are able to check the demo of latest CVS with IE,
perhaps you can confirm that it's not working...
There was a recent thread here, explaining why...
I've tracked it do
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
Leonardo , I guess you bring up some very valid points , that are
irrelevant in my scenario ,. The applications i am trying to build
are ment to replace desktop apps , that don't have the users used to
bookmarking or pressing the back button . For my purpose bookmarking
and t
Bug58 I think. But don't let me stop anyone from making a release. We can do them as often as we see fit. Do make sure it's all working in IE first though. On 3/22/06,
Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's stopping us from beta-2 release?--Ing. Leonardo Quijano VincenziDTQ So
so Andy you have checked in something that should work without that ,
should I give it a test run then ?
On 3/22/06, Cosmin Bucur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i never use direct = true
>
> On 3/22/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i've done a small bug fix but also you should not
Leonardo , I guess you bring up some very valid points , that are
irrelevant in my scenario ,. The applications i am trying to build
are ment to replace desktop apps , that don't have the users used to
bookmarking or pressing the back button . For my purpose bookmarking
and the back button should
What's stopping us from beta-2 release?
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Andreas Andreou wrote:
Doesn't firebug show the response?
You could also enable the debug console
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/userguide/Debugging.html
but you're most probably dealing with a resolved issue.
Doesn't firebug show the response?
You could also enable the debug console
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/userguide/Debugging.html
but you're most probably dealing with a resolved issue.
You could try a nightly build of beta-2
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/nightly/
but it may need a different dojo ve
Well it's good to know, but then again it's a limitation of Tapestry?
Dojo? Tacos?
Someone should take the blame.
I did recall having some problems with DatePicker, but they could be
from something else.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Ughh...I don't hav
Ughh...I don't have time to respond to this thread right now, but it has nothing to do with tapestry. It was jetty, and it does happen you guys just don't see it in most instances.. It was only the img loading of the DatePicker. Something about jetty thinking the img was a linked resource or someth
Hi all.
I click on my AjaxDirectLink with debugging turned on, and I can see the
ajax request go across the wire via Firebug.
I am getting some kind of info back because the debugging log is
scrolling a bunch of stuff. However, before I have the ability to read
these log messages, the page
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
And then the user loses the address bar. Having the ability to write
("/someApp/section1/PageX.html") in the URL is very useful. I just hope
this new breed of single-page apps recognize this.
Most of the users I deal with , gov and health industries , don't know
what an
dojo can include files such as:
/myapp/js/dojo/iframe_history.html
and others under
/myapp/js/dojo/
However, now that you mention it, i've also been using dojo + friendly
urls in a project for at least
4 months...
And after all, tapestry servlet returns an existing html file in the
context as is,
> And then the user loses the address bar. Having the ability to write
> ("/someApp/section1/PageX.html") in the URL is very useful. I just hope
> this new breed of single-page apps recognize this.
Most of the users I deal with , gov and health industries , don't know
what an address bar or an exp
Andreas Andreou wrote:
By the way, what happened to the friendly URLs I set in the tacos
demo? We can actually have both ways of accessing pages, you know (the
/app? and the friendly url).
I asked jesse 3-4 days ago, the final response was
"not very friendly with dojo resource includes.
It
Hi Andreas. I'm using tacos beta 1. I do have the same problem with
the form.
Unfortunately this proxying issue is due to historical reasons for how
our current development environment is set up. Our designers will post
static files to a virtual host i.e. xxx.tolweb.org and the webapp set u
> By the way, what happened to the friendly URLs I set in the tacos
> demo? We can actually have both ways of accessing pages, you know (the
> /app? and the friendly url).
I asked jesse 3-4 days ago, the final response was
"not very friendly with dojo resource includes.
It's not just the html ref
Another question:
Does the same problem appear when using a simple AjaxForm
(use the same listener as in AjaxDirectLink, set the same updateComponents
and just add a simple submit button ) ?
And which tacos version are you using?
Danny Mandel wrote:
> Hi Andreas. So, it will work in production
But the bug reporter accepts attachments, I think:
For example, there's an attach button below.
*http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BugReporter/Bug84
*
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
It would be great if i could attach example pages easier . So far i've
copy p
Hi Andreas. So, it will work in production no problem because I use
Tomcat and I can set the serverName and serverPort to return values that
match the fronting proxy server so the domain and port will be the same.
In development, however, I'm using JettyLauncher which doesn't appear to
have t
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
===
99% of the stuff I do is component in component because I strongly
believe an Ajax app is an application that runs from a SINGLE page .
And then the user loses the address bar. Having the ability to write
("/someApp/section1/PageX.html") in the URL is v
i never use direct = true
On 3/22/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've done a small bug fix but also you should not use
> direct=true in these cases...
> From the docs:
> Direct, specifies whether or not to do a direct service call for
> component. This will improve the performanc
It would be great if i could attach example pages easier . So far i've
copy pasted code in my e-mails but that's not as effective . I was
contemplating for a while , getting one of my own servers where I can
install apps that reproduce bugs and show you but so far i've been
unable to find one which
On 3/22/06, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh right.
>
> Yes, this is a problem I found out some time ago when using some Tacos
> components. I use a lot of Component-in-Component in my application, so
> those bugs tend to surface there. But I haven't used the autocompleter
i've done a small bug fix but also you should not use
direct=true in these cases...
>From the docs:
Direct, specifies whether or not to do a direct service call for
component. This will improve the performance of the call dramatically,
but will probably produce tons of exceptions and **problems if
Ahh right.
Yes, this is a problem I found out some time ago when using some Tacos
components. I use a lot of Component-in-Component in my application, so
those bugs tend to surface there. But I haven't used the autocompleter.
As for the demo, actually, a better solution is to showcase a full
Yea, this will eventually be done...
Either here or in tapestry.
For the moment, what we've done is create a special folder in the demo
where we put pages that reproduce bugs. The idea is that perhaps users
can attach similar files whenever they post bugs (esp. those users that
build from cvs ).
phew
On 3/22/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, i see this behaviour too, and
> i think i know what is going on there...
> Working on it :)
>
>
> Cosmin Bucur wrote:
>
> >anybody ? is there anything extra I should do ? should I repost my
> >code ( which is preety much like the on
Leonardo , please check my post regarding the autocompleter as an example .
In the dedmo the autocompleter is the ony component in a .page ... I
tried using it , and i needed to have it in a jwc that would be inside
a page . This was as far as I could go because the autocompleter was
made to work
I'm sure this can be fixed in a workstation independent way ;).
I'll catch up later if I get a chance.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Andreas Andreou wrote:
It's just that the paths are different...
Our local builds use
/app
and the demo site uses
/tacos-demo4/app
Leonardo Qu
Well we can make the new demo site do whatever we ant so.Should be sending out accounts to people later in the week. On 3/22/06, Andreas Andreou <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:It's just that the paths are different...
Our local builds use/appand the demo site uses/tacos-demo4/appLeonardo Quijano Vi
It's just that the paths are different...
Our local builds use
/app
and the demo site uses
/tacos-demo4/app
Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
> Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
>
>> But the demo actually does that:
>>
>> http://tacos.mine.nu/tacos-demo4/selenium/
>>
>> By the way, the "Tests" sect
Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
But the demo actually does that:
http://tacos.mine.nu/tacos-demo4/selenium/
By the way, the "Tests" section on the demo has to be deleted. Hmm...
pre-selenium times.
But it seems the online version of the selenium tests is broken.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano V
But the demo actually does that:
http://tacos.mine.nu/tacos-demo4/selenium/
By the way, the "Tests" section on the demo has to be deleted. Hmm...
pre-selenium times.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
Speaking of demos ...
Has anybody considered yet , havin
ok, i see this behaviour too, and
i think i know what is going on there...
Working on it :)
Cosmin Bucur wrote:
>anybody ? is there anything extra I should do ? should I repost my
>code ( which is preety much like the one before ) ? should I add a bug
>?
>
>please let me know ,
>Thanks
>
>On 3/2
Speaking of demos ...
Has anybody considered yet , having a "demo" application that actually
does something as opposed to just showing each component in part ?
It looks to me like most components work great by themselves , but
when you put them into an app , or combine them together , or try to
u
anybody ? is there anything extra I should do ? should I repost my
code ( which is preety much like the one before ) ? should I add a bug
?
please let me know ,
Thanks
On 3/21/06, Cosmin Bucur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for not following up with this earlier , i've been trying new
> excit
Hm, I should not have mentioned spring ... ;-)
This was only because of their integration of aspectJ which is a very
interesting thing as it very easily allows to use aspects with your
beans.
Hivemind is another beast as it allows for runtime/deploytime assembly
of services and therefore the quest
43 matches
Mail list logo
